@Nicholas McFadden here is the folder for the paraquat files
@Nicholas McFadden Hi Nick, the next files for paraquat are ready to be uploaded into the VM to create the audit file.
Hey can you send me the list of leadIDs for that went from CSP review ?
these are the lead #s that we changed from Signe e-Sign CSP Review to Signed e-Sign RE-TRIGGERED today
Lead ID 441614 520656 522640 517200 437465 513863 524903 522398 512349 527432 524525 520481 526759 514613 527368 514354 522254 507398 425215 477572 509278 508876 517309 518762 515156 513698 510756 512764 473125 497746 517271 509263 507243 449339 503632 423761 464012 513998 519345 424070 520319 501956 522992 512639 520936 511833 519308 522168 454071 513616
Paraquat-
364215 went final on 01-08-24, e-signed date is 01-07-24
357710 went final on 01-11-24 but still in the dashboard as Signed e-Sign Flagged
Camp lejeune EO-
499724 went final on 05-13-24 but in the dashboard on 05-12-24
523628 went final on 06.18.24 but in the dashboard for week ending 06.02.24, but is in the benchmark for a E-Signed date of 06.12.24
373536 This is in the dashboard for a E-signed Date of 06.23.24 but it is a Signed e-Sign QA WIP
475755 would have hit the dashboard on 04.17.24 when it went Signed e-Sign, but on 04.19.24 it would have came out of the billable dashboard and put into the Declined part of the dashboard because on this date it went into Signed & Declined status
Camp Lejeuene NON-EO-
430377 In the dashboard for week ending 05.12.24 but didn't go final until 05.13.24
506134 In the dashboard for week ending 05.26.24 because the original signed date was 05.25.24 But Benchmark has it for week ending 06.02.24 because it went final on 05.28.24
504891 This is in the dashboard for week ending 06.16.24, this is a Signed e-Sign QA WIP
@Nicholas McFadden I just had to add back in a lead# for CPAP benchmark, the lead# was 497194 because the agent on 06.25.24 changed the status out of Signed e-Sign QA to just Signed e-Sign so I fixed it back and the QA number on the benchmark has been updated as well, but it is going to show in the TIP dashboard as Signed e-Sign and not Signed e-Sign QA
similar 4952152 needs to be changed
went final 4/30 and then screwed up a bunch and last edit was yesterday
Lets get that added to be overriden and lets do our reconciliation tomorrow around 8:30/9am after the script updates
@Nicholas McFadden Flatirons on my end has been reconciled and the lead# you gave me is now back in the benchmark and the dashboard for CPAP
this is what the dashboard says when the lookerstudio is having issues :
lead #'s 507564 and 507697 went final on the 20th but have an e-signed date of the 19th.
lead# 507246, 506080, 437838- e-sign date-05-18-24 lead# 506578, 472091- e-sign date- 05-17-24
Also the following lead# 507697 has an e-sign date of the 05-19-24 but didn't go final until 05-30-24
does not having a dash mark in the status on the dashboard affect your script? for example: Signed e-Sign Billable Declined by Firm
Signed e-Sign - Billable Declined by Firm
@Nicholas McFadden here is the list of lead #s, case type and the previous LR status is the status in the TIP dashboard, and the current LR status. along with the e-sign dates, also the one lead # that has the Signed e-Sign - Billable Declined by Firm without the dash in the TIP dashboard. These haven't been updated yet in the dashboard.
@Nicholas McFadden can you please find out if these two test leads still need to be in Signed e-Sign Retriggered, if these don't need to be now, then I can change the lawruler status back to test lead dispos.
you can switch them
@Nicholas McFadden Flatirons has been reconciled on my end
@Nicholas McFadden hey btw all I am waiting on now for degree is the final grades to post next week so basically I am completed now. My degree will be conferred on september 1st, also I haven't had a chance to mention that I received an email from the school while you are on out of the country where I have been invited to the first round of video submissions to be looked at for being a Speaker for the Graduation Ceremonies.
@Nicholas McFadden Flatirons on my end is 100%
@Nicholas McFadden flatirons is good to go
Hey btw one of those job applications at one of the Casinos IT department I was talking about last week are now in the screening process
@Nicholas McFadden I started to write out a detailed python code to create a game last night
I just started to write it out ,I haven't ran it yet, its one of those I like to do by just start typing and see what develops once I run it and start to tweak it
@Nicholas McFadden flatirons is good to go
@Nicholas McFadden flatirons is good to go on my end of things
@Nicholas McFadden this is what I putting in my notes let know me what you think and if there is anything we should add to it , change or delete from it.
Nick McFadden from the integrations team wanted me to bring an idea your way to help elevate some of their roadblocks when it comes to software, they need or updates to software they need done. Our thoughts are that one this could elevate some pressure off your plate, especially when we know that you are busy with many tasks and get pulled in many different directions. So maybe utilizing myself as the in office point of contact to authorize these updates and software they need to do some of their tasks but like Nick said he could be the one to veto this on his team to help ensure that they arenβt doing anything without his approval first and use me as guidance knowing cybersecurity and what is safe to download and what would potentially cause issues down the road. Also, this will help ensure that our patch management process I feel as well.
Can you slide over to my office to discuss
Nick McFadden from the integrations team wanted me to bring an idea your way to help elevate some of their roadblocks when it comes to software, they need or updates to software they need done. Our thoughts are that this could elevate some pressure off your plate, especially when we know that you are constantly being pulled in multiple directions. Our suggestion is to utilize myself as the in office point of contact to authorize these install and updates of software. Nick said he could be the one to veto/sign-off on his team's requests to help ensure that they arenβt doing anything without his approval first and then use me as guidance knowing cybersecurity and what is safe to download/what would potentially cause issues down the road. Also, this will help ensure that our patch management process I feel as well.
@Nicholas McFadden I emailed over my bullet points to Joe yesterday, so I will let you know what he decides once him and I discuss the proposal ideas to him
@Nicholas McFadden flatirons is good to go on my end of things
@Nicholas McFadden flatirons is good to go on my end of things
@Nicholas McFadden which linux distribution does your team use for when they are running WSL2?
Not sure ask Dustin
@Nicholas McFadden what does your day look like tomorrow anytime after 12pm? So I can meet with you over the process of the API Team deploying packages.
Shot you an email. I got some medical record info from DiCello that needs to be included. If it has t been Iβll make sure you all get it. Is there a shared inbox I can send it to?
@Nicholas McFadden does this need to be added to the Benchmark google sheet correct?
It has the updated info for if/when the medical records were received/completed. This was missing when they switched to Litify. I can add whomever needs it to include in the Flatirons Benchmark report.
I will forward this to edward, he runs an app script in google sheets that updates this information
Do they have a distro email account? Since Brianna is going to be reconciling too feel like it would be good that all of you get it
Brianna actually quite, so I am going to get with Brittany today to figure out who this will be but for now it will still be me
ok i am heading to lunch but when i am back I will get with edward on the medical records partr
You can send the report each time to the following email: reportingteam@tortintakeprofessionals.com
I got with Edward and I believe he is updating it manually for today until he gets a chance to fix the app script to compensate for the different header names
@Nicholas McFadden will you be available this Friday for the google meeting
I was talking about the google meet we discussed possibly doing while you out of the office regarding the API team deploying packages
Should I include Joe in the invite?
Do you want my whole team or just Dustin and I?
Yes I will be
When you get in today, if we can chat about the reporting information that Brittany's team has gathered together for the API package development for reporting
did you want to discuss the API packages after the meeting with Brittany today, I have a few other things I had to add to the list of items to go over with you.
@Nicholas McFadden Good morning I am following up with you per Joe's request to find out if you have provided LR the dates that they requested from you regarding the data dump.
@Nicholas McFadden Good morning, I just wanted to follow up from our meeting on Monday to see if we have figured out a way to extract all the call recordings out of connex.
@Nicholas McFadden Good morning, I was wondering what time you wanted to meet today regarding the landing pages
@Nicholas McFadden are you still wanting to meet regarding the landing pages today?
Iβm sorry man unless youβre planning to be around in 30min we can find time Monday or Tuesday
Iβm just want to see what they are are how/where the data is being currently sent to
I can stick around for the next 30 minutes, I have plenty to do anyways to stay busy for the next 30 minutes
@Nicholas McFadden Good morning, I was just following up with you to see where we are at with the API packages, I know that Dwight and Daniel were working on one of them the other day, also have you had a chance to see how we are able to get all the call logs from connex downloaded as well.
We can discuss today Iβve been on nothing but flatirons for a couple days now. Deployments are not priority so letβs figure out Connex first
@Nicholas McFadden Hey I have question regarding the integration we have with torticity Ben Crump MVA clients , before these clients are pushed from leadspedia over to the firm, is there a filter in the integrations to block potential malicious activity going through.