Hey Desiree, I just wanted to ask a quick question on the Depo Provera customs you sent over to Ryan. Custom22996 is a header "Treatment" and Custom23383 is in the old Do Not Use questions. Do you still want them sent over ?
ok cool. On that same note, you guys haven't received any of these leads yet right ?
nothing has been sent over to you for Depo Provera?
Good morning Desiree, we sent a test yesterday for an older campaign we had to rebuild. firefighting foam - crump - elg - shield legal. I was hoping you could let me know if you received it (ID: 2500326). Also for future reference, when asking about tests who should I reach out to? I don't know if that's something you want to deal with.
Good morning Daniel, yes, the test case is in our system? And for questions about tests you can contact me first; however, depending on what the test is I may have to redirect you to someone else.
For sure. yes it was in your system
Hey Desiree, I sent another test but this time it is for firefighting foam - crump - elg - BLX with the ID: 2500386 . Do you mind confirming with me that everything looks good on your end please?
Hey Desiree, I have sent a test lead over for Depo Provera - crump - napoli - shield legal. the ID is 2500665. do you mind confirming with me you received it and it looks good ?
Hi Daniel, im heading back to my office now and will let you know
Hi Daniel, it did come through; however, the case categorization is incorrect.
• Case Type is "Vaccine-Not Death" • Case Group is "Defective Pharmaceuticals" • Case Subtype is "Depo Provera"
Ok thank you I'll make those adjustments
Hey Desiree I have just talked with dustin and he said we don't have case Group
Good more, Daniel. Can you clarify what you mean when you say you do not have it? Is it something that can be added?
Its not a field that we ask for. We'd have to get SmartAdvocate to add it
I'll have Mal send them and email and I'll let you know what they say
Raul just got back to us, said "there is no group type via API it's only Case Type"
Good morning Desiree, I hope you had an excellent weekend. I just sent another test over with the ID of 2501056. Should a good test, can you confirm with me on your side that its fine please?
Good morning Daniel. What type of case is this test lead for?
I see its a test depo case. It came through fine, however, the case type, case group, and case subtype is incorrect.
It is for Depo Provera. They are all wrong again?
"caseType": "Vaccine-Not Death",
"subType": "Depo Provera",
This is what I have for both, They are hard coded so they cant change. And Smart Advocate told us that case group doesn't exist on their end so we can't add it
case group: general negligence case type: negligence case subtype: unknown
ok I'll see what the deal is there and get back to you. Did you receive the rest of the information?
Hey Desiree, ok we just sent a new test. I think it fixed that issue. Can you let me know if that was the case?
Just checked it's still showing:
case group: general negligence case type: negligence case subtype: unknown
thank you. ok. let me confer with Dustin. I'll get back to you.
Can you send me the whole results of the tests lead from yourend
Can you send me the comment box please ?
this is a screenshot on the incident tab
it could be case sensitivity. What we hard code needs to be exactly what you have on your end or it won't match and it come out negligence.
Yeah This is probably a smart advocate question
Good morning Desiree, we have heard back from Smart Advocate. They think it is likely due to exact casing not being matched. Do you mind confirming with me that what I have below is exactly correct for both the type and the value? Casing, special characters, spacing, etc;
caseType: Vaccine-Not Death
subType: Depo Provera
Case Type: Vaccine - Not Death Case Group: Defective Pharmaceuticals Case Subtype: Depo Provera
Ok, I sent another test just now. Is there any change?
Good morning Desiree. Have you guys received leads from Civil Rights LSA campaign yet?
Sorry my fault, I'm getting my campaigns mixed up
Also I just sent a test lead over for Civil rights, does everything look in order?
Hi Daniel, while we've received Depo cases daily, the last one to be put into the system via the integration was yesterday and is 2501072
So, you wouldn't need a back fill of those leads from that campagin? (Depo)
I just checked it's in the system but populating under "Negligence" just like the Depo cases were
for case type and and sub type? Do you mind forwarding me those values for the civil rights campaign?
There's more that needs to be discussed with this, are you in the office today?
*Thread Reply:* This lead was also showing up as a negligence case
Good morning Desiree, I just wanted to follow up with you about the test lead I sent around noon yesterday. Just wanted to make sure that you got it and it all looks good
Hey Desiree I have another test for a different campaign. ID: 2501237 Birth Injury
thank you
hmm well i took case and sub type out of both
that might be why the are "negligence"
I can add "case type" back but then I would need the exact casing like last time
Hey Desiree, just to follow up with you. So Birth Injury does not require an integration. What about the other one I'm currently working on, Civil Rights? And just to confirm, future campaigns won't need one unless you let us know?
Hey Desiree, I hope you had a relaxing weekend. I just wanted to follow up on my questions from last week. Because if Civil Right is still a go, I want to finish it up for you so we can get it active
Ok, load of my plate lol. Thank you!
haha don't play me like that Desiree
I have alot of it completed so if that changes then I'll finish it up for sure. I think until then I have to focus on other campaigns.
Good morning Desiree, I hope you are having a fabulous morning. I just wanted to see if the CA Juvenile Detention Abuse - Crump - Slater - Shield Legal Campaign requires an integration
Good morning Desiree, I think is this end up being a daily or weekly message lol. I hope you don't get tired of me. I want to know if Oxbryta napoli requires an integration on the Crump side?
Good morning, yes, Oxbryta can be integrated into Smart Advocate.
we also coded depo provera to have an integration so if you want, any future leads can be automated
just let me know and we can turn it on for you
If the Depo cases are set to integrate then please turn that on
On the topic of Oxbryta, do you mind sending me your guys intake questions? I'm sorry I'm ambushing you with questions lol
You would have to get that from Anthony's team they create the intakes
For Michigan Pollution do you have these fields?
"acquiringLawFirm": "Test Law Firm",
"coCounselLawFirm": "Test Co-Counsel",
"source": "Shield Legal",
"caseType": "Mighigan Pollution",
"caseDetails": "Test Case Details",
We only have source and caseType, and the caseType is Toxic Tort.
Good morning Desiree, I just completed a test for Michigan pollution. The ID number is 2501504, can you check to see how it came out on your end please?
It came through but the Case subtype is incorrect. Right now it shows "unknown" but the subtype should be "Michigan Pollution."
Ok i just ran another test, samee lead id. External ID 2501515
I’m leaving for the day, so any other tests you need me for will have to wait till Monday.
do you need me to send over what we have ?
No, we've manually put those in. So from yesterday onward is fine.
Morning Desire, Dwight let me know of the issues you were experiencing about the first name. That should be fixed
Don't forget to let me know what the co Counsel value is when you get a chance
Depo - Napoli Shkolnik PLLC Michigan Pollution - Environmental Litigation Group P.C. Gaming addiction - The Meadow Law Firm
is it all part of the "Co Counsel" ?
Dustin told me its possible but it would require alot of work
I know we already have injured party mapped to your cases
Hi Daniel, please see the attached spreadsheet. Some of the cases have already been integrated into Smart Advocate so you can disregard those.
ok thank you for this !
I don't know if you're familiar with the wood pellet case but that campaign just started today, can you add that to the list as well? The co-counsel is Environmental Law Group.
Hey Desiree, I hope your day is going well. This list you sent is all the cases that need integration, however you told me earlier that Birth Injury doesn't need one. Do you mind clarifying. I'm a bit confused now.
Hey Desiree just in response to the list you sent me of needed integrations, i've compiled a list here.
Completed
Oxbryta - Crump - Napoli - Shield Legal Oxbryta - Crump - Napoli - BLX Depo Provera - Crump - Napoli - Shield Legal Depo Provera - Crump - Napoli - BLX Michigan Pollution - Ben Crump Law - ELG - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - Crump - ELG - BLX PFAS Water Contamination - Baypoint - ELG - Shield Legal
On Deck
CA Juvenile Detention Abuse - Crump - Slater - Shield Legal Chowchilla Womens Prison Abuse - ACTS - Crump - Shield Legal (waiting on ACTs)
Not on our Monday yet
Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Injury - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal
Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Property - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal
Michigan Pollution INJURY - Ben Crump Law - ELG - Shield Legal
Illinois Juv Hall Abuse - Crump - TPMB - BLX
Illinois Clergy Abuse - BCL - Slater - Shield Legal
Illinois Clergy Abuse - BCL - Slater - BLX
MD Juvenile Hall Abuse - Crump - Slater - Shield Legal
Exxon - Dicello - Crump - BLX
Exxon - Dicello - Crump - Shield Legal
Navy Federal Credit Union Discrimination LSA - Crump - DL - BLX
the "Not on our Monday" list, obviously we don't see on our monday or don't see "yet" so we don't have information of these needing an integration. Can we confirm they do? Also anything missing of my list? (sorry to ambush you again no rush)
Hey Desiree, we have a crump campaigns on our on Deck but not on your list.
Insurance Claims SIL - BCL - BCL - BLX
just want confirmation that this does not need an integration
fantastic, I am creating a test lead for ca juv hall abuse, I will let you know when i send a test
Good morning Desiree, I've sent a successful test for CA JUV hall abuse with slater. the external ID is 2501949. When you get a chance, do you mind letting me know how it came out on your end? Thank you
Hey Desiree, Good morning. I just wanted to follow up with you about the test lead I sent yesterday
It came through but isn't categorized correctly. The appropriate categories are:
Case Type: Sexual Abuse Case Group: Sexual Abuse Case Subtype: California Juvenile Detention Abuse
Ok I've changed the case type and subtype respectively. Though group type is still not supported. if everything else is good we can turn it on
Good Morning Desiree, Happy Friday. Sorry to bombard you again, just want to know if there is any other changes that need to be made. If not, it is good to turn on. Also when we turn it on, do you need us to do a back fill?
but i've made changes to case type and sub type .
i just wanted to know if there needs to be any other changes? if not it is good to turn on.
as well as if you guys need a backfill after we do
ok I will send it. I'll give you the ID it should come in around 10:30 ish
Sorry for the delay, all the categories are correct, thank you.
Good morning. Can you send me an updated list of the mass torts that have been integrated into Smart Advocate? Thank you.
Good afternoon @Daniel Schussler. Can you send me an updated list of the mass torts that have been integrated into Smart Advocate? Thank you.
Hey Desiree, I believe these are the ones. Basically the same as before
Completed
Oxbryta - Crump - Napoli - Shield Legal Oxbryta - Crump - Napoli - BLX Depo Provera - Crump - Napoli - Shield Legal Depo Provera - Crump - Napoli - BLX Michigan Pollution - Ben Crump Law - ELG - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - Crump - ELG - BLX PFAS Water Contamination - Baypoint - ELG - Shield Legal CA Juvenile Detention Abuse - Crump - Slater - Shield Legal
These ones below have been completed but not for Crump
Chowchilla Womens Prison Abuse - ACTS - Crump - Shield Legal (waiting on ACTs) Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Injury T1- Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Injury T2 - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Property - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal
Good morning Desiree, Currently we don't have any campaigns in the pipeline for Crump. Nothing on our Monday board.
If i remember correctly you wanted wood pellets automated so we can add crump automation to those
those can probably get done today or tomorrow. will you need a back fill?
"caseType": "Sexual Abuse Chowchilla", "source": "Ben Crump Law, PLLC", "subType": "Chowchilla",
these ok for chowchilla?
CaseType: Sexual Abuse Case Group: Sexual Abuse Case subtype: Chowchilla Women's Prison
Why is the source Ben Crump Law, PLLC, and not Shield or TIP?
I can put shield, I'm doing whatever it is to your liking. I'm not sure of your preferences which is why I asked
any other changes? this should be ready to go
Then I'll start on the wood pellets
"caseType": "Wood Pellet Exposure", "source": "Shield Legal", "subType": "Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Property",
good for wood pellets ?
casetype: Toxic Tort Case Group: Toxic Tort case subtype: Enviva Wood Pellet Exposure
Good morning Desiree! I hope you are having an excellent week. We just got a new campaign in our monday , McDonogh School Abuse - BCL - Slater - Shield Legal, and i wanted to know if you guys wanted an integration for it
Good morning Desiree I just wanted to follow up with you on this
Thank you, I say that because there’s some additional information our firm would like and I want to talk with you to make sure it’s possible.
Heads up this might be a question to Cam or Malissa, if you are looking to add questions
Good morning @Daniel Schussler, do you have time to come meet with me right now for 10-15min?
sorry i was in a meeting i can come now if available still
McDonogh School Abuse - BCL - Slater - Shield Legal
school abuse ?
Yes, thank you, give me a few min to open the case type in SA.
case type: sexual abuse case group: sexual abuse case subtype: McDonogh School
Can you make sure the following information is uploaded:
• retainer • the co-counsel is - Slater Slater Schulman LLP • each plaintiff name and each plaintiff DOB • plaintiff address, email, phone number If you have issues with the intake forms not being completely filled out please let me know and I will speak to the inbound team.
ok so starting on this one you do want all the questions to be pushed over ?
I want to say yes, but since I don't know what all the questions are since I didn't create the intake form for this specific campaign, I don't know if there's perfect 1:1 match in Smart Advocate
ok, if thats the case we can wait until they are created by SA
Good afternoon, can you please send me a list of all campaigns that have been integrated in SA? Thank you.
completed Oxbryta - Crump - Napoli - Shield Legal Oxbryta - Crump - Napoli - BLX Depo Provera - Crump - Napoli - Shield Legal Depo Provera - Crump - Napoli - BLX Michigan Pollution - Ben Crump Law - ELG - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - Crump - ELG - BLX PFAS Water Contamination - Baypoint - ELG - Shield Legal CA Juvenile Detention Abuse - Crump - Slater - Shield Legal Chowchilla Womens Prison Abuse - ACTS - Crump - Shield Legal (waiting on ACTs) Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Injury T1- Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Wood Pellet ETO Exposure Injury T2 - Crump - ELG - Shield Legal Gaming Addiction - Ben Crump Law - Meadow Law - Shield Legal
in progress Bard Powerport - BCL - Simmons Cooper - Shield Legal
queued McDonogh School Abuse - BCL - Slater - Shield Legal
Hey Desiree, I just wanted to follow up with you and/or remind you of what we talked about yesterday. Let me know if there is anything from our end that you need.
Hi Daniel, I told you I would forget and I did. Can you remind me what we specifically talked about yesterday?
haha. no worries. We talked about Bard Powerport and McDonogh and you wanted to start receiving more than just the usual fields you have been getting. Probably need to reach out to SA about getting a map to our fields so we can send those over
haha. no worries. We talked about Bard Powerport and McDonogh and you wanted to start receiving more than just the usual fields you have been getting. Probably need to reach out to SA about getting a map to our fields so we can send those over
Also, I believe you mentioned some of Zek's mappings were wrong in his test? maybe the casetype , subtype?
Good morning Desiree, I hope your week has gone smoothly. I wanted to reach out see SA was able to get Mappings set up for McDonogh School abuse?
absolutely, enjoy the rest of your day!