Hi @Cameron Rentch I believe you may be requesting to see directions commission in the google spreadsheets. If so the link to that spreadsheet is here: direction commissions google spreadsheet
Thanks Edward.
Also Doug Rochen from Dicello would need access to Looker enterprise as Nick and I are building SA dashboards for him. How can we go about granting him access to that since I believe he will need credentials created for him? I confirmed with him that he hasn't login looker enterprise before. @Ryan
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ , thatβs basic user admin. Go look at how Ryan@tort is setup but the key is Content Access after user setup.
He should ONLY see his folder, use SUFO to test.
*Thread Reply:* Thank you @Ryan I shall do some investigating and use what you mentioned as a reference point
We already have a Flatirons section, do some investigating
@Ryan note this is not a standard financial dashboard. @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ can you confirm these are the ones we discussed that have the specific data points for the abuse cases
Yes @Cameron Rentch This is the specific data points for the abuse cases
So it will be for Flatirons and Non flatirons case types. I recall doug also mentioned non SA cases too such as soup campaign as well
Either way, create a folder and give him permissions at the folder level @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ , avoiding him seeing anything he should not.
*Thread Reply:* Copy that @Ryan I was thinking the same thing
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ let me review them before you share with anyone. thank you!
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ what is status on the abuse dashboards? Flatirons needs to priorities and rush the San Bernardino one. Also if we can get them a google sheet pivot temporarily that will suffice. Can we get by end of day?
@Cameron Rentch Would be able to finish wrapping up the Chowchilla dashboard today and for the San Bernardino that one is next on the list to work on. Doug said there are about 27 cases for that one. If that is the case I can have both ready by EOD and I can present it to you tomorrow & then we can share with them?
I believe they'll be impressed with the dashboard, especially since I'm incorporating features and filters that aren't possible with pivot tables (attaching a screenshot as an example). Since this is for Flatirons, I can easily grant them access via the existing "Flatirons Group" we set up for their Looker Enterprise dashboard (flatirons-dash@shield-legal.com). Could I present this to you first thing tomorrow morning? I'll dedicate today to ensuring everything is ready.
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ yes thatβs great. Looking good. We do need to see the type of abuse as well, that is factored in? Also I think good to see current age of victim/claimant
Yes that will be factored in. Okay if that is the case I can include that too
Good morning β Iβm sharing the link to the two dashboards for Chowchilla and San Bernardino: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/22 I set them up under a Looker board so theyβre all in one place. You can click into the specific case type (like Chowchilla or San Bernardino) and access the dashboards from there. I added filters that I think will be most commonly used, but I can add others if needed. Access has been granted to the Flatirons Group, so as long as they log in with their credentials & they have the link, they should be good to go. @Cameron Rentch Update on the dashboards
ok @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ looking great, update as follows:
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ did you see my notes abive^^
Updated. I did for both Chowchilla and San Bernardino removing those three. As for the facility, are you referring to central valley, high desert juv, etc ? If so I do have those points and those filters. Or are you referring to where within the facility such as bathroom, gym, etc ? @Cameron Rentch
Ohhh I see what you mean. Looks like not all clients have the facility location for some. Let me fix that
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I am driving for the next hour or so. I will check this as soon as I am back in front of my computer.
Sounds good. I understand what you mean so it will be fixed in 10 mins or else β
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I have reviewed it looks raeally solid. Great work on this. I am trying to get a google /gmail address to share for flatirons I will post when I have it
Thank you @Cameron Rentch Sounds good. Also I wonder if we should create some login credentials for Doug Rochen as well or if we are sharing the same one you are working on for flatirons
Also, Alex C from VSS has been super helpful with the data work for the Chowchilla dashboard and would likely be a great resource for future dashboard support as well. Would it be possible to get her set up with Looker Enterprise credentials? From what Iβm seeing, it looks like she might need a paid viewer license to access the dashboardsβthough let me know if Iβm wrong on that.
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ let's discuss these creditials tomorrow, need to loop in @Ryan and Joe
For Flatirons can you please send login credentials to tylerperryflg@gmail.com ASAP and let me know when sent?
*Thread Reply:* Sent login credentials to him. Links:
https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/22 - Link to the board https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/126 - Link to San Bernardino dashboard specifically. https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/124 - Link to Chowchilla dashboard specifically. @Cameron Rentch
also, I need the precise link to send to him?
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ can you please confirm Above^^
The same link I sent you Cameron will work. They would be able to click on Chowchilla or San Bernardino
https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/22 - Link to the board https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/126 - Link to San Bernardino dashboard specifically. https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/124 - Link to Chowchilla dashboard specifically. If we provide them the credentials / login for flatirons-dash@shield-legal.com then they shouldn't have any issues accessing the board and dashboards. @Cameron Rentch Friendly update
As for those login credentials it should be the same above but for password I am not sure. @Ryan May know it or @deleted-U07CRGCBVJA may know it?
Including @deleted-U05QUSWUJA2 @deleted-U07CRGCBVJA on this for reference
I have NOT dealt with that login specifically, so I have no intimate knowledge of it, I can change it... but of course, not ideal if other users/processes are attached with it
Thank you @deleted-U07CRGCBVJA. @Cameron Rentch For giving this email access: tylerperryflg@gmail.com I do not see an option to do so in Looker enterprise (I typed in the email but doesn't allow me to click add). I think this is because we have to create a user viewer credentials for that. I would need someone to help assist with that part or show me how since I haven't done that before. If we try flatirons-dash@shield-legal.com email that would work and what I granted access to
@Cameron Rentch I shall look into the settings and see if I can. Working with @deleted-U05QUSWUJA2 as we speak on this
Okay looks like we can do that under "Edit User". I believe I got it to work and it should of sent email to set up password to tylerperryflg@gmail.com. Sending a screenshot for visual. Also please let me know if Terry Perry is correct first and last name since that's how I set it up for now with that email.
Please confirm if we are Good To Go (GTG) on this when possible. Thanks
I feel confident we are good to go. Just need them to confirm with us that they received email for creditials
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ @Joe Santana I will confirm with you that they received the credentials
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ Tyler is in the dash. Clocked in the San Bernardino table but no data is showing. Itβs says βnothing here yetβ
Okay I readded him again and I went into "sudo mode" which allows me to see what Tyler is seeing. From what I am seeing he should be able to view it now. Here is a screenshot to verify this. Have him refresh his page
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ Tyler confirmed access and ability to see data. Very good. Thank you
Good morning @Cameron Rentch Doug is asking for creditionals to view those two dashboards I created. Would you like for me to get that started for him and if so should I give him access with his email or should we create a gmail for "dicello" where he can access it from there? Just in case we want to share that with others in dicello
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ yes please proceed and good morning! We will add people individually
Sounds good. Thanks for the reply. I will ask him what is his preferred email
Doug confirmed he has now access to the dashboards and I showed him how to use it as well, friendly update on that. Do I have permission to create login creditionals for Alex C from VSS so she can utilize the dashboards too @Cameron Rentch Also do we know if we already shared these dashboards with Abe already since he did mention in Jira to me in the past he also wants to be involved with that as well.
yes @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ Alex and Alan please both would be great. We should also share with Abe. Great job and thanks for giving Doug a demo!
Thank you @Cameron Rentch Okay I will create those two for Alan and Alex. β For Abe his own email or do we know if he can login with flatirons-dash@shield-legal.com ?
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I would give Abe his own login
Good morning @Cameron Rentch. Sounds good. I shall post when I share it to him in Jira then
Okay I have shared it to Abe, Alex and Alan in Jira π
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ, thank you for all the client services dashboards. Great work. Can you send me the folder link to these new ones so I can review.
@Ryan You're welcome. Here is the board: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/22 and here is the folder: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/folders/70 Note: These are not financial dashboards but rather specific fields from the intake / secondary interviews that Doug requested.
Thanks Edward!
Friendly heads up we may need to send Abe his login credentials for the dashboard since he is requesting for that along with, he wants me to create users for two other members of his team (Niko and Jessi).
I learned how to create the users so I can do that for Niko and Jessi @Ryan
Can we email Abe his login credentials for looker enterprise please.
Should I create a new user for Abe with his preferred email or do we have one already created already for him & if so how can I get that info to him? Sorry.
Oh okay I shall create one with his email then. Thank you @Ryan
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ, great work on these dashboards and board.
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ can you please create a data point dashboard for DL/Flatirons for Polinksy Childrens Center Abuse
awesome thank you! It is only 17 or so cases but Flatirons wants to expand budget so getting data asap would be very helpful!
17 is definitely easy to work with. Going to finish my hair relaxer reconciliation per my email I sent to you and Abe and then I'll hop on that β
thank you!
@Cameron Rentch I was able to complete the dashboard for Polinsky Children's Center Abuse. Link: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/130 Also can be found in the board with the other dicello SA cases (link): https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/22 Please note I used the intake questions which isn't as depth as the secondary interview so some fields may be missing due to that. The other dashboards I built was using the SEC (secondary interview questions) since that one has all that is needed but with this dashboard I was able to scrap quite a bit of info. Also I found 3 other ones that were signed in these statuses: WIP, retrigger and signed & declined. I included them for now but I can remove if needed
@Edward Weber thank you I will review tonight
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ Great work on the Polinksy stuff. I need another simple dashboard ASAP for DL/Flatirons.
AFFF PFAS Military Base
diagnosis and counts is all that is needed>
IE
All Diagnosius should be one of these, so need counts on these:
Prostate cancer Bladder Cancer Thyroid Disease Thyroid Cancer Liver Cancer Ulcerative Colitis Kidney Cancer Testicular Cancer
@Cameron Rentch For AFFF PFAS Military Base - DL - Flatirons - SL Do you want to see just finals or also declines ?
https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/133 Here is the dashboard @Cameron Rentch Let me know if you like it. And if you want me to put it in a board I can as well
Thank you @Edward Weber ! I will review today!
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ good morning also can you tell me of the last 50 PFAS Militay base cases what was the make up of the diagnosis?
Good morning @Cameron Rentch Are you referring to what was the latest 50 clients' diagnosis?
Yes please @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I am trying to see of the last 50 signed what the diagnosis counts are.
Ie how many of each
Kidney cancer Testicular cancer Thyroid cancer Liver cancer Ulcerative colitis
The last 50 signed these are the #s:
Ulcerative Colitis - 24 Thyroid Cancer - 4 Kidney Cancer - 14 Thyroid Cancer - 5 Testicular Cancer - 2 Liver cancer - 1
Awesome @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ Ty
@Nicholas McFadden @Edward Weber @Joe Santana
Guys. Please review this and get me an answer by mid day tomorrow please.
Between June 29-July 3 we had a high amount of Paraquat cases that dropped out (ie either law firm signed and declined or QA signed an declined. Can you please investigate and give me the reasons here and what type of declines we had, along with a reason. Thank you. Very important request from Flatirons.
https://tortintakepros.slack.com/archives/C095KQBJ9PC/p1752446862834159
Let me know if this helps @Cameron Rentch & Luis stated that he would like to be reached out if you need him to dig any further
All reject reasons would be under the notes section in LR for each lead ID is what he stated as well and he changed them based off what JP's medical record report says (we compare the status they have compared to what we have and we change it based on what their system says)
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ please put the PFAS AFFF military base cases into a board ASAP.
please let me know as soon as it is loaded in and ensure that everyone has access please and thank you
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ we also need to get all of the other DL/Flatirons abuse cases into dashbaords using the same data points. These are:
Chowchilla Illinois Abuse Maryland New Jersey Abuse Pennsylvania Abuse Arizona Abuse Nevada Alameda Abuse Mormon Abuse
Please work in the above order, and please work to get these completed by end.
Sure. Are you referring to the same data points I made for the other boards or do you have any specific points you would like to see only
I shall go with same data points they all share and if we need to include more we can
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ the same data points we have in the other abuse boards please. thank you
Hey @Cameron Rentch β quick update: Iβm making strong progress on the backend development to automate dashboard updates. Iβll be transitioning to building out the visuals next. Would it be possible to get an extra day or two to finish setting up the SA abuse dashboards? Each one contains ~40 questions, and with 9 total dashboards, that's around 360 data points to map and structure. Iβm currently creating a dedicated data table for each campaign, joining fields from multiple sources, and aligning them to specific questions. Once those tables are ready, Iβll connect them to Looker, build the LookML, and then create the visuals β all with automated updating in mind, rather than static reports. I could rush out the visuals today, but I think itβs cleaner and more sustainable to wire them directly into the database pipeline. With that said since they need PFAS AFFF military base cases by EOD I will make sure that one is good to go but the others I may need a bit more time if that is okay?
@deleted-U07CRGCBVJA @Cameron Rentch β quick update: I spoke with Joe and will be delivering the PFAS/AFFF dashboard as a static version for today. This allows us to move forward while I continue developing the automated backend that will eventually pull data directly from our database. The static dashboard should be ready within the next few hours. After that, Iβll shift focus back to the SA abuse dashboards. Iβm currently building out the necessary database tables and pulling in the correct fields for all 9 campaigns. My goal is to have those ready by end of this week or, at the latest, by Monday. Iβll continue sharing progress updates daily as I work through them. Let me know if you have any questions or need anything prioritized differently
@Cameron Rentch I have the board ready for AFFF-PFAS. Here is the link: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/24 Thank you for your patience on this. Currently I had to pull a report to be able to create it on time (by EOD today) however tomorrow and the following days, I am going to work on pulling data from the database, mapping questions, etc to create the necessary tables in bigquery to connect it directly to the dashboard to have it updated daily. @deleted-U07CRGCBVJA Tagging you for visibility purposes. If anything needs to be changed I can update
These are the ones who I shared access to the board (they just need the link to be sent to them).
This old dashboard: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/133 is probably not needed (the one I created a week ago) since the one I posted above has this information and more as a friendly heads up
Thanks Edward!
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ good work. Please also add this email address and share all flatirons dashboards
Credentials have been sent to that email and permissions have been granted for all the flatirons dashboards I've created to that email. Let me know if you need me to share the link with them or anyone else & I can send that to them either by email and/or Jira @Cameron Rentch
can you send me the link again I will forward along thank you!
Yes for the board and dashboard I created yesterday the link is here: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/24
is this contained in the main dashbaord link with all others?
So this one would be for the SA Flatirons dashboards all in one board: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/22
This one is just DL Flatirons dashboards (non SA related): https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/24
So those two board links will have all the dashboards I create for them. I am thinking this approach for organization purposes?
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ why are these numbers different then what you sent me yesterday? I already sent this and if they dont match I am going to get throtted
Are you referring to this link @Cameron Rentch: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/133 for that screenshot or this one: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/146
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ please lets do the following:
Question for you on this AFFF/PFAS dashboards. The screenshot you sent me is this link: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/133 I am thinking of just removing that dashboard and allowing them to view the same data but in this dashboard instead: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/146 which has the same info but more fields? Or do they simply just need a dashboard that only shows diagnosis info because if so I can update that right away
I will update that dashboard right away adn then work on the benchmark sheet
You can remove 133. But make sure the numbers are properly reflected with the enhanced 146
Sounds good. 146 is last night's numbers so I will update it based on todays & once I get that done I'll post in the chat. After that I will work with brittany to fix the benchmark stuff and then after that I will jump into the coding stuff to have those dashboard automatically updated
@Edward Weber I donβt understand.
What are the accurate numbers?? I already send them a PDF of 133. Please confirm those are the correct numbers?
Then and I am going to look like a complete idiot that provides wrong data. How can numbers be that far off? Look at count differences on each diagnosis and total counts. Itβs all wrong
Sorry. @Cameron Rentch I am going to review those #s right now to see what you are referring too
Pull them up side by side. Itβs very easy to see the numbers and counts per diagnosis are completely different on 133 and 146 as well as the total counts
Ah yes 490 law ruler id #s in 133 and 352 for 146. I am going to review the statuses to see if one is missing or if it is another case type
I shall pull a refresh report in law ruler since 490 should be correct from dashboard 133
Thank you
Okay for dashboard #133 - we have total 490 law ruler IDs. For dashboard #146 which is the new one we had 352 but now it is 521. The reason it was showing 352 instead of 521 since one of the filters which is "number of known exposures" was filtering out 169 of them even though I put all counts (which has up to 100,000 exposures). So simple fix, I simply removed that filter for now and now it is showing 521. This is the most up to date # and the one you sent to them 490 is just slightly outdated so if you need to send it to them daily I will make sure it gets updated daily (currently building the code for that but I can update manually til code is ready) just need to know by what time you need that dashboard updated / ready for you to send
@Cameron Rentch. Also worked with Brittany and she stated NEC and Soup has one for one matching for the flatirons benchmark now & We are currently working on checking the other campaigns as well.
Great thank you @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ please remove the exposure, water source, and military branch data and tables, let's just have the diagnosis. I have some other ideas to add things later but thats it for now. Let me know when this is done please
@Cameron Rentch Dashboard updated. Let me know if this looks good for your end as well. I will update this board daily (M-F) and will work towards building the code to automate it as well
yes thank you @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ but something is still "off". I am showing 489 PFAS AFFF Military Base total claimants signed. Your dash is showing 514, minus the "6" none of these.
and the benchmark sheet is showing 483
I can't send this until all of the numbers "match" otherwise they are going to tear me apart
thank you let's also remove the "DQ" ones there is no reason for those to be there
Okay I found the discrepancy. It is the statuses. To confirm the 483 on the benchmark consists just of these statuses: Signed e-Sign FINAL, Signed e-Sign QA, Signed e-Sign RE-TRIGGERED, Signed e-Sign FINAL - SENT
My dashboard was also including WIP and signed & declined. If that is the case, I shall remove those and only keep the ones above that way it will match 483
Going to make those adjustments now in the database for this table / dashboard
perfect let's do that please
let me know when this is done @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ thank you
Will do @Cameron Rentch Currently working on fixing it as we speak
@Cameron Rentch Dashboard 146 updated. I have count of 483 and benchmark has 483
great thank you @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ good morning. I know you have alot on your plate. I have another dash that we need for Flatirons for AFFF (same data points as with PFAS). Can you please put this ahead of the priorities with other dashboards? Please also make sure we validate the counts against the DL/Flatirons dashboard? Please let me know as soon as I can get this dashboard.
@Cameron Rentch I have Firefighting Foam - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal dashboard is ready to go. Friendly heads up, I'm still finishing up the automation code for this dashboard along with the other dashboard (testing & code building), but for now, I've set it up so I can quickly update it manually within a few minutes without any issues. This lets me shift focus to reconciling the Flatirons data. I've double-checked against the Flatirons benchmark, and everything matches upβI included a screenshot for verification. Quick heads-up: I noticed Law Ruler ID 573652 has an answer marked "None of these - disqualify" under client diagnosis but still shows a signed e-sign final status. It might be worth having Luis C or Jackson take a quick look at this intake, especially if you're planning on sending a PDF copy over to the firm. I've granted everyone the same dashboard access as before, but let me know if any changes are needed. Dashboard link: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/151
*Thread Reply:* Note: I had slacked Luis C about this so he can investigate for law ruler ID: 573652
Following, Thank you! LMK if anything is needed from me in the sense of resources/communications/follow up from myself, management, or ownership
*Thread Reply:* Sounds good & you're welcome. I'll keep you posted if I do
thank you @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I am reviewing now
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ when you are able, please review the attached to ensure 100% that all of the DL Flatirons total for combined counts (AFFF and PFAS Military) is matching. Also, please make sure the indiviidual AFFF total diagnosis counts and PFSA diagnosis counts are accurate and total up properly:
https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/146 = PFAS (total counts shows 489) https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/151 = AFFF (total count shows 1484 signed)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZkSwATpVmNK6CXMZPXNhL5IelLgTIZlSrKKxeV3b9Ic/edit?gid=0#gid=0 = Total combined Feb 1 2024 - June 30 2025 AFFF and PFAS combined counts
https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/7de80e04-43be-4479-af16-acbb9b517dbf/page/ASVvC = Master Flatirons customer dash Shows = 1599 AFFF Shows = 493
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ @Ryan @Joe Santana Guys the data MUST match, so please dig in. I need to get this AFFF dash with accurate counts and diagnosis (Board 151) to Flatirons today (Wed 7/23)
*Thread Reply:* @here this is a manual matching. Old client reports need to be updated with new, soon to be delivered SL financials and real time counts. Otherwise @Zekarias Haile , need to ensure we are reconciled from old system to match up.
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ , using this new data from @Zekarias Haile new SL financials to count contracts and creating the new client Order Summary to go with your Case Details pages will be critical.
FYI @Nicholas McFadden , we will discuss this today but we need to get off the old BI data ASAP. Cannot have static old client dashboards being reconciled against new Real Time, that is going to fail. They rolled out reports before we were ready.
*Thread Reply:* @Ryan Yes that is correct. It is currently manual based since I am still testing / writing out the code to have things automated for the dashboards while working on reconciliation of flatirons data. I shall update the dashboard to get both to match with today's #s but will ultimately need to set time aside to get it automated if they are comparing real time data with my current version of dashboard
*Thread Reply:* Yeah, we have to get existing dashboards using new counts ASAP and ensure all are updated to use the financials @Zekarias Haile and @Nicholas McFadden are going to focus on, with support from @James Turner to ensure what is on TIP side is on SL side.
*Thread Reply:* @Cameron Rentch Both dashboards are updated and align with Flatirons benchmark numbersβI've included screenshots for verification. I'll be working on the automation coding for the AFFF and PFAS dashboards later this evening, once I've finished today's Flatirons reconciliation. However, both dashboards are current as of 11:00 AM PST and ready to be shared with the firm if needed. Please let me know if this works for you. Tagging @deleted-U07CRGCBVJA for visibility.
*Thread Reply:* @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ, nice work. Keep me in the loop on all of this, as our new BI system has to validate across all systems until we cut away the old system. π
*Thread Reply:* great @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ thank you
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ please ensure that the same email addresses are sent access to the 151 dash as with the 146 dash.
*Thread Reply:* They should have access to both since I put them in the same board and folder so good to share if needed
@Ryan @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ ok I have another priority for dashbaords. For all Levinson ELG campaigns for AFFF and PFAS (this includes all TC campaigns as well), we would like to get individual dashboards of all e-sign finals with pivot table of diagnosis with total counts. These should look exactly like the ones you did for Dl Flatirons with AFFF and PFAS. Thank you! Can you please let me know a reasonable time frame to expect these? FYI @Joe Santana
@Cameron Rentch I can shoot to have them ready by EOD Tuesday if that's fine with you ?
That works @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ
To confirm you want all of these as individual dashboards @Cameron Rentch (Sharing a screenshot below) (You stated AFFF, PFAS for TC and ELG) which these are the only one I am finding.
Also all forms of signed finals right? (Signed e-Signed Final, QA, retriggered, etc) but no signed & declines
Hi @Cameron Rentch β I was able to complete those dashboards and I am now sharing those links down below:
Excellent @Edward Weber I will review! Thank you!
@deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ can you please send invite asap to marc@sunrisessm.com and barmazelmarc@gmail.com to ther ELG dashbvaords to review? thank you
Do you have preferred first and last name for both emails since that is what looker enterprises asks me when I create those viewer logins
@Edward Weber Marc Barmazel and M Barmazel 2 is fine
Sounds good. I shall send those out shortly
@Cameron Rentch Both emails were granted access to those 7 dashboards; marc@sunrisessm.com was already created in the system so they may need to use whatever password they created in the past to login and the other email, that one should of received credentials for a password setup. If those links were not shared with them through email it would be needed as well
Hi @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I have another dashboard request:
Using the same data points we have used on the Juv Abuse cases with DL/FL we would like to have dashboards created for LA County/CA Juv Hall abuse and Maclaren Hall and LA County Foster care and Juv camps abuse for: ACTS/Levinson TC ACTS/LOSG TC LOSG TC/Slater (Note I know we do not have any "post acquisition data points on these) Shield AZ Law (Note I know we do not have any "post acquisition data points on these)
Hi @Cameron Rentch Sure thing. To confirm you want those campaigns above to look like this dashboard below (Mormon Abuse Campaign)
https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/181
Also the statuses I will use are the ones in the flatirons benchmark so that dashboards matches the flatirons benchmark at all times. Sounds about right?
Yes @deleted-U06C7A8PVLJ I do not know that we will have "status" for the ACTS or LOSG, but for campaigns we have done the secondary interviews and facts sheets etc, we shouold have the info!
Okay that works with me. I will work on building that and will make the proper adjustments as we go. Do you have an idea on when you need this by? It may take a few days to make and polish from my end