Also available at: https://app.eraser.io/workspace/fWraknKYYLvA7uKNJzBu
First thing in the morning, please create a prioritized list of all DL integrations with their status (old endpoint, new endpoint complete, not started, in progress). Also include if we need any IDs (Sikich send a bunch of IDs) to finish the integration.
this should be mostly good now i think
> Joe Santana [9:10 AM] > When possible, MUTE all MICS there, and please make statement, from me, to "please watch our TONE, no need to be overly assertive" > [9:10 AM] Joe Santana > > Maintain Politeness > [9:10 AM] Joe Santana > > Adding to tension, will not help
Plan for DL Integrations: Add SSN & Email & DOB validation to campaigns going to the new endpoint (currently 3) Follow the priority list (On Hold=Not Started if we have the IDs & In Progress on the first pass, then old endpoint on the second pass) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/155xSWtVyYOqqzKjUhM2C2hN4kAQZg-mH/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=114165242934158510149&rtpof=true&sd=true We are missing 9 pairs of IDs
Plan for DL Integrations: Add SSN & Email & DOB validation to campaigns going to the new endpoint (currently 3) Follow the priority list (On Hold=Not Started if we have the IDs & In Progress on the first pass, then old endpoint on the second pass) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/155xSWtVyYOqqzKjUhM2C2hN4kAQZg-mH/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=114165242934158510149&rtpof=true&sd=true We are missing 9 pairs of IDs
```Plan for DL Integrations: Ask for missing ID pairs (9): Hair Relaxer Cancer - Crump/Dicello - Shield Legal 303 Michigan Juv Hall Abuse - DL/BG - Flatirons - Shield Legal 600 Tepezza - Dicello - Shield Legal 293 Salon Professional Bladder Cancer - Dicello - Shield Legal 556 Hair Relaxer PFS - Dicello Levitt 1663 St George School Sex Abuse - Dicello - Flatirons - Shield Legal 1805 Tepezza - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal 606 St Paul School Sex Abuse - Dicello - Flatirons - Shield Legal 1804 Porterville Developmental Center Abuse - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal 2041 Add SSN & Email & DOB validation to campaigns going to the new endpoint (currently 3) Follow the priority list (Currently e-sign count since May 1st) First pass: On Hold (11) if we have the IDs & In Progress (3) Second pass: Old endpoint (28) on the second pass https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/155xSWtVyYOqqzKjUhM2C2hN4kAQZg-mH/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=114165242934158510149&rtpof=true&sd=true
For each campaign:
Verify we have the IDs
Do the Mapping
Verify that SSN, Email & DOB validation is in place
Add Name parsing if older campaign from before the first & last names were split
Submit a test lead to verify data flow
Get approval from DL that everything is correct
Move to Production
Re-trigger leads as necessary (backfill)```
@Daniel Schussler @Richard Schnitzler Any comments?
that looks great to me
From Joe: "Maintain Tone and do not be aggressive"
Just got a notification that Nick Cirino checked out my linked inā¦. Thatās awkward
Yesterday too for me, I guess more efficient then asking
I looked back...
No idea, could be a different carter?
ok so that will mean anything before that we should delete
who the hell is going to do that ...
clearly does not understand... today's subtitles have been provided to you by ...
clearly does not understand... today's subtitles have been provided to you by ...
@Chris Krecicki Is looking in the DB for any other test email domains
what the hell is he doing here ...
we did. it has been fixed. i told him that
so... hes looking for someone to point fingers at again
so face development is an excuse for them, not for us ?
Please double check the mapping.json files for DL and the shared sheet to ensure the mappings have the correct ParentMatterID & CaseTypeID and the shared sheet has the right LR Case Type ID
google sheet vs what we having in the mappings?
https://developer.salesforce.com/docs/atlas.en-us.api_rest.meta/api_rest/resources_query.htm
i dont like where this is going....
Please give me a list of DL test leads. Leads with Test or Mock in the name or other tests.
Microsoft Teams Need help?<https://aka.ms/JoinTeamsMeeting?omkt=en-US> Join the meeting now<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_MDVkOGY0MzMtOTJjMC00ZmEzLThlOGQtMmRkNDA3OThhMjQ0%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%229b9c6b7e-397f-419e-82dd-db42bc3cad88%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22e7f1be75-4202-45df-81f3-8ead2cf8e8e0%22%7d> Meeting ID: 288 293 976 646 2 Passcode: SV7ak3RE
That zip of the questions also needs to be confluence
https://github.com/shield-legal/gcp-integrations/pull/258
this is a intake questionnaire team problem not us
god it feels like we are going backwards
598 - 441614 - CPAP - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal 2138 - 823746 - Sacramento JDC Abuse - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal 1767 - 627791 - Chowchilla Womens Prison Abuse - ACTS - Dicello/Flatirons (TIP) - Shield Legal 605 - 157800 - Camp Lejeune - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal 604 - 517061 - Camp Lejeune EO - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal
sent to DL , i'll send 640 at home,
and send the message with all info and matters to sahil
ACTS disabled for 1767
I was confused because Iām pretty sure we disabled it the first time
possible a full deploy (all functions) re-enables it. we should fix that bug
it will be fixed in the branch i will create for the changes i am working on
Then I need to merge those 3 branches?
.... are they really not blaming us? thats crazy
need questionnaire and question ids, parentmatter and case typpe
Does any of these integrations use the default or contact card fields in the mapping? Camp Lejeune - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal Chowchilla Womens Prison Abuse - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal NEC Baby Formula - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal
CPAP - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal Firefighting Foam - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal
I would have to double check but I think Chowchilla or NEC baby formula might
don't they all at least have a few?
@Richard Schnitzler Does salesforce have a suffix field for the role? (Can we put suffix in the DL mapping and not have it error?)
Salesforce by default does not have a role object, so no. I believe lead and contact both have prefix fields by default