The 4PM Meadow meeting overlaps with the 4PM Cameron meeting in CR1 that includes Alan, Me, Brittany, Tony
Questions for AZ YRTC - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal
Hi do you have a few minutes to glance at the template for SA YRTC that I made to make sure from an integrations perspective it makes sense? If you have suggestions to improve it Iโm game. Not really concerned about the intake just secondary
The VSS tab makes sense. Everything that I think should be split for integrations is split. I think it is good
Do you still have your BG email? Becker keeps email it instead of your tort email
sobos team is still building it i havent gotten an update yet
such a good job being persistent on the SA thread for VGA. Goooooood job!
Did we (integrations) send you the file for the secondary?
It looks like they just hit export from LR then reformatted it. I have a better report I am verifying that has the question types, but I have found where the same question is asked multiple times but as different types, example dropdown (yes/no) then text box. I have also found 1 true duplicate question.
there are 5 duplicates:
โข 30 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 37 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 64 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 63 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located
โข 91 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 92 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 63 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located
there are 4 duplicates:
โข 30 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 37 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 64 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 63 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located
โข 91 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 92 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 63 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located
there are 5 duplicates:
โข 30 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 37 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 64 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 63 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located
โข 91 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 21 (Abuser 1) Facility the abuse was located
โข 92 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located is a dup of 63 (Abuser 2) Facility the abuse was located
Let me check if any of the duplicated questions have been filled out with different anwsers
i guess i am confused where the hiccup occurred. whenever it is ready feel free to jump in and reply w. the save =]
How often do you think a secondary interview is completed and sent to a firm for a single case type?
Is Can you provide the address of the home you were abused in? the full address? If so can it be split into address, address2, city, state, zip?
Can (Abuser 1) Name (Full name if available): be split into firstname, lastname?
Is (Abuser 1) If yes, please provide details about where the client received treatment: a full address? If so can it be split? Or does it correspond to (Treatment Center) Mailing Address Line 1:?
The approval by Becker last night: Do you know if the questionnaire fully built?
Then did I send a wrong file to Becker? I do not see MI JDC in LR
No idea but he has not been there for at least 2 weeks
That room is currently in use until our meeting time (10)
ill be a few minutes late. a crisis call
You slack has your BG email instead of your tort email
https://nvbar.org/for-the-public/find-a-lawyer/
you now have access to the report tool on the website
Yes you are a returning user o Username: nhsettlement@dicellolevitt.com Password: NHSettlement25!
New Hampshire YDC Abuse SEC - DL - Flatirons - Dicello Levitt
just to confirm -- under column LR question i am just basically summarizing the question into one cell without spaces?
No, that is a copy of the LR question verbatim.
https://forms.gle/voSRbkff2XyxMaeA7
If your email about the conference room is for 6/12. You will also have to talk to Gannon since that room is double booked
lol yep I saw. It was triple booked. ๐ฉ lol itโll be fine Iโll figure it out
I got beckers request. Give me about 30 minutes to put it together
Can you help me find the case types he is asking about? I cannot find the NEC Meadow and the only Depo I can find is Meadow / Seeger
Hey Becker email โฆ when/if cam says yes will you still be able to pull those?
Yes, once I have a case type I can pull from, it will not take long
Yes, once I have a case type I can pull from, it will not take long
Approval was given, do you know which case types I should pull the questions from?
any standard nec intake questionnaire (preferably SGGH/DL if applicable)
Depo - Meadow / Seeger - 1993 NEC - DL / Flatirons - 1799
Those are ready, waiting on the other 4 case types
lol nobody could ever accuse you of being slow ๐คฃ
Ive been on PTO since Wednesday, but still had to reply to some messages
It also helps that after the first request of this type for Becker, I wrote a script. All I have to do is give it the casetypeid and within seconds it outputs the format he wants.
This is where I am. Its hot and desert, and I only 1 screen per laptop (2 laptops)...
Talk about roughing it (total 2 screens, not the scenery) ๐
lol ok will you send the Becker data as soon as you have it done ๐ค:skintone3:
I need the other 4 case types for examples. The 2 afff, and the others
I will send them out tonight. I am currently in a meeting
I think Becker is securing funding to push meadow + then DL organically. But if SGGH has any of afff or hair relaxer that works too! Ok perfect thank you!
Just to verify: AFFF PFAS Military Base Exposure - Meadow Law - Douglas London = Shield Legal - 2049 Firefighting Foam - VAM Law - ELG/Meadow Law - Shield Legal = 1876 Which Anapol? Video Gaming Sextortion - Anapol Weiss - AWD - 3PL = 2052 or Video Gaming Sextortion - Anapol Weiss - AWD - Shield Legal = 2048 Hair Relaxer - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal = 603
Youโre the best! I appreciate you. Youโre gone another week?
I will be remote next week, vs PTO the last few days
what statuses should I ignore? currently it is: โข Secondary Interview - Completed โข Secondary Interview - Final โข VGA 2nd Interview Completed - Tier 1 โข VGA 2nd Interview Completed - Tier 2 โข VGA 2nd Interview Completed - Tier 3
There are 1200+ with no notes outside of one of those statuses that has not been updated in > 7 days
the only ones used are referall accepted, secondary interview completed (then the tier 1's) some use warehoused but idc thats a placeholder
So then where do you want me to look / not look?
Which box is that? Intake / PD / Screen or Office Location
thank u! if it isnt horribly hard to do something like this of secondary interviews completed id love that. csp's use that status too though and i only would want abuse/tech etc. i get most automated emails upon completion except for dl because they just keep adding
I can clone and change the status its looking at. Still no notes with no update in 7+ days?
just a daily batch of any status changed to completed that day
thats a whole different query, give me an hour
for Video Gaming Sextortion SEC - Anapol Weiss - AWD - 3PL
I have no idea, maybe the missing email on the last line?
Mail Street 1: (Mailing Address 1 & 2) needs to be split
Have you experienced/suffered these injuries from the abuse suffered related to Roblox? Check all that apply: has a question type of paragraph not picklist
Medical Facility (Information): (Please list the medical provider, counselor or therapist who diagnosed the Roblox-related injuries described or any pharmacies where prescriptions for treatment were filled. Include the Facility Name, address, and dates of treatment/use) needs to be split to facility name, facility address 1, facility address 2, facility state, facility city, facility zip, dates of treatment
You have a few questions near the end (81-88) that are marked as paragraph but have a list of values
You have a few questions that have multiple questions in one, please try to separate them
for the secondary thing u made me the lead id isnt fetching anything in lr what am i doing wrong
I have the code from @deleted-U08GMHAPRK2
ill come by around 2 to show you some of the edits they mentioned that were previously unfixable bc of template and well see if u have a better way =]
The Arizona test case that Becker is asking for, is that for Arizona Juvenile Detention Center - ML - Secondary Interview or a new case type?
the intake is what he sent you.. but this intake will be usable for Chowchilla and Arizona intake too
do we have a case type name for chowchilla yet?
no... that was the pushback lol r u able to send the intake in that format he likes with the secondary in that format and then hell do what he does and they can case type clone then
sobo follows his priority list which is totally fine but also Becker kind of operates differently and we know that cam ok's it
What case type is the intake then? 1948 - AZ YTC Abuse - Burg Simpson - ML - Shield Legal?
I dont see any instances of juvenile in these. Are they good? They are a direct clone of the AZ case types mentioned this morning.
I am assuming the AZ campaign that Becker sent is AZ YTC Abuse - Burg Simpson - ML - Shield Legal. Is this correct? The questions line up and do not match with Arizona Juvenile Detention Center - ML - Secondary Interview. Unless there is a new campaign not built yet
The file he sent does not have a co-counsel
lol it does not matter truly. text him --
Do you know of a code or hack to read articles online that blocks the pay to piew wall
Nothing that works 100%. That article is readable on my phone using the browser Brave
Ad blockers sometimes work. Knowing how to manipulate the page also sometimes works. A RSS feed will be a text only version. Also some articles get reposted for free if you search the headline or keywords
I think it just slipped through the cracks but I try to make sure I use the full case type when referencing a case. Since the attached email, I only see communications about AZ intake with Meadow
That lead was sent to <a href="mailto:JDC@meadowlawfirm.com">JDC@meadowlawfirm.com</a> on 5/8
Should it have been <a href="mailto:AZ-JRTC@meadowlawfirm.com">AZ-JRTC@meadowlawfirm.com</a> instead?
There is also the thread titled: Arizona Abuse intake and secondary fields that ended with the MI campaigns but talked about changes to AZ SEC
I am not sure that we (integrations) made the changes specified in that chain
Didn't think you needed to be there and didn't want to waste your time
Yes, but itโs been an intense 15 month journey, so I def want to be witness to the final fix. Any of the projects that are abuse extortion based please throw me on the invite and if impertinent just mark me optional. I like to have a gauge of context just because issues on my end impact you and vice versa at least from firm behavior standpoint.
I just realized Becker saying he only like working w u on meeting etc was his strategic way of saying Dustin isnโt going anywhere and that Carter and Nick can miss the next one. I know Iโm still included lol
But basically warning Carter to only say say nice things and not mess with u lol
I can see the logic behind that, but did not think about it at all
can u pull me a report that has each line a new question not in a column way...? sggh sextortion secondary. they want to modify questions even though I think they'll pause that then throw budget into gaming.
So the normal format i send to Becker? I will not be around a computer for a few hours. You will have it this evevning
Which cocounsel for sggh or exact case type?
Video Gaming Sextortion SEC - Ghozland - SGGH - Meadow Law - Meadow Law