hi Luis! Anthony says you're the guy for this. i sent it to Tony too. The firm is rejecting this one because they said the latency period is not within the criteria.
Yikes this should not have been signed or finalized. Latency is over by 5 years. I will put in a decline status now
probably some training that needs to happen. The firm was surprised that wasn't caught
Hi Luis, I've got another rejection from VAM. Same reason - Latency period - 667778 Calvin Jones
Per Tony, Please forward this to Jackson so he can compile into a report and send the data to Cameron ๐
hi @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M! I'm doing a project for Cam. do you have a report that shows the cases that AWD/Wagstaff rejected for Paraquat?
Here you go, I had to do a bit of digging https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1giYtXkjq4CUTvgoZJ71kJ4uRqywVp1T6ZTwD1Yhcu1w/edit?gid=856886086#gid=856886086
thank you so much! I'll let you know if i have any questions. ๐
Do you have backups for that spreadsheet you made me on Tuesday? Like stuff from the firm stating they declined those?
also, i have a list they sent me. Can i send to you and see if we received the DQ request from them?
good morning @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M! I have a question for you about 643256 - Benjamin Romero. Did he just stop responding?
Yes, he stopped responding to us. But I was never told to decline him
ok it sounds like the firm hasn't been able to reach him either so i think we're going to decline him. I'll let you know. ๐
709153 - Mormon Victim Abuse - HRSC - AWD - Shield Legal
Good morning, There was a slight mix-up with some of the review files and 709153 ended up getting signed. Looking back at chat history, I dont think this one was sent to you and we reviewed before we began pestering you with firm review files.
PNC was sexually abused in California at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by two Leaders of the Church. Elder Jenkins and Elder Matthews abused the PNC between 1992 and 1993, during two instances of oral copulation and rape.
However, the reason For Review: PNC is currently 44 years old and was born in 1981. Per the criteria, the PNC must currently be 39 years old or younger and born on or after 1986.
Criteria states - "If Abuse occurred in CA/OR/WA AND out of SOL: โฆ Send for review (DO NOT SIGN) IF: โช๏ธ The client is currently over 39 years old (They may still be accepted on a case-by-case basis)"
I'll run it by them. Worst case we do a signed and decline right?
it's been an interesting experience and i'm glad i'm helping with it. It's actually helped improve my relationship with Dicello, which wasn't bad at all. Abe was just impressed that I took the time to learn stuff
So sad news @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M That's a reject
I had the feeling, we will decline it accordingly. Thank you
Hi Malissa, This is already signed 735142. We are wondering if you can reach out to get approval for this facility.
San Bernardino County JDC Abuse OSOL - SGGH - AWD โข The PNC was sexually abused at Silverlake Youth Services by Michelle King from 2000 - 2001 when the PNC was 16 years old. Michelle King raped PNC daily/weekly over 9 months. All incidents were vaginal penetration, skin-to-skin contact and lasted around 30 minutes. PNC was then allowed to be attacked by other inmates while the staff looked the other way, as the other staff members wanted to pursue relations with Michelle King. Lastly the PNC is currently 41 years old currently. -Reason for review: The PNC was incarcerated at Silverlake Youth Services. Which is a nonprofit organization based in Yucaipa, California, within San Bernardino County. It operates group homes and residential care facilities, including a facility known as "King House." These facilities provide housing and support for youth, particularly those involved in the juvenile justice system.
Hi Malissa, This is already signed 735142. We are wondering if you can reach out to get approval for this facility.
San Bernardino County JDC Abuse OSOL - SGGH - AWD โข The PNC was sexually abused at Silverlake Youth Services by Michelle King from 2000 - 2001 when the PNC was 16 years old. Michelle King raped PNC daily/weekly over 9 months. All incidents were vaginal penetration, skin-to-skin contact and lasted around 30 minutes. PNC was then allowed to be attacked by other inmates while the staff looked the other way, as the other staff members wanted to pursue relations with Michelle King. Lastly the PNC is currently 41 years old currently. -Reason for review: The PNC was incarcerated at Silverlake Youth Services. Which is a nonprofit organization based in Yucaipa, California, within San Bernardino County. It operates group homes and residential care facilities, including a facility known as "King House." These facilities provide housing and support for youth, particularly those involved in the juvenile justice system.
Hi Malissa, have they responded on this one. I know some take days, but SGGH has been unusually quick
Not yet on this one. several key people on their team are travelling right now so maybe later today?
Got it, that could be why. I will let their supervisor know (they were bugging me about it) Thank you
sounds good! No worries. ๐
Thank you, they seem responsive today. I figured bumping it up to top of their inbox may get us an answer
They are. And thatโs a decline. Future note - If the person was under 39.5 they would take them
Or they want it to be a stronger case ๐คทโโ๏ธ
We signed as OSOL though? And the criteria tells us we can sign if over that 39.5
I'm thinking the attorney forgot. I forgot the age on that one lol
I'm just waiting to hear back. Let's keep it on the backburner for now
Sometimes. Some of them have the best worst memories
like... they'll totally remember some random obscure statute but will totally forget to pay the invoice i send multiple times a month. ๐
hi @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M I think some Dublin - Pride Law Firm Signed & Declines got missed. I can forward you anything you need. They are:
Joanna Lizarraga Debra Jimenez Perez Tracy Fournier Jacqueline Soares
I'm trying to figure out if anyone ever got in touch with Stacy Deming.
Are these firm declines? They are all currently in final status and have cleared our processes. Any reason to decline them would be from post-acquisition and I would need a reason for each to reflect a status change
Joanna Lizarraga Declined - Credit She hung up on us after her facts didnโt add. I questioned her about the inconsistencies and advised her that she will be prosecuted for fraud if sheโs lying. While I was talking to her about that, she hung up on us.
Debra Jimenez Perez Declined- Credit Lied. Her story made no sense.
Tracy Fournier Declining Credit Left her a vm and sent her 3 emails. No response. Did not respond to PI either.
Jacqueline Soares Declined Credit SOL issues. Also lied. She said officer smith is black. He's a white man who is currently on trial.
Got it, Tony had asked me to loop Jackson in so he can enter onto a sheet and have Cameron review before we make the status changes.
Welcome back Malissa, have you heard anything back about 735142 by any chance?
@deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M sending that one again. This time i wrote OSOL all over my email lol
ok that worked. They're good to sign
Malissa, thank you. You donโt know how much that one has been bugging me seeing it sit in our list ๐ญ ๐ญ
i just had to repeatedly say "OSOL" apparently lol
i know the firm is slammed with all of these SA cases
Hi @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M Can you review these PNCs for me and let me know if they're valid?
699994 NEC Baby Formula - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal Antonio Heard 3/18/2025 Signed e-Sign QA 03/19/2025 11:51 AM Last contact 3/20
750189 NEC Baby Formula - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal Presley Burbridge 6/5/2025 Signed e-Sign QA 06/06/2025 09:58 AM is this a valid e-sign?
780995 NEC Baby Formula - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal Skyla Smith 6/28/2025 Signed e-Sign QA WIP 06/29/2025 11:56 AM is this a valid e-sign?
587060 NEC Baby Formula - DL - Flatirons - Shield Legal Victor Fontaine III 9/7/2024 Signed e-Sign QA 09/09/2024 01:34 PM is this a valid e-sign?
Sure, Iโm out of the office till tomorrow but I can give these a look once Iโm home this evening.
What is in question, the e-sign documents or something else?
Two of them are old (like pre May 2025) and I'm wondering if they're still in QA because the PNC went AWOL.
QA without the โWIPโ means treat as Final, in other words โSigned E-sign QAโ is a place holder for things that are moved out of Final. They are counted the same as Finals with billing.
The 780995 might be the only one with a pending issue since itโs in WIP. Iโll give them all a look just to be safe.
699994 - Valid case. Was moved to Signed e-Sign QA after a new agent moved from Final to contact attempted
what about this one? 780995
750189- Valid case, the agent moved from Final to sent e-sign after sending a new contract out ๐ฟ
we've pulled the retainer and i'm trying to see what our final number might be.
780995 - Incomplete file, still in limbo. Contract errors and the possibility that the PNC was not born prior to 36 weeks. I'll ask Tony if he wants to extend the lifeline on this and since its only been slightly over a week since signing or decline if the resolution here is urgent.
we might need to decline if there is a lot of issues. but yeha bug tony
tony would know patterns better than i would lol
*Thread Reply:* I'll bring it up in our meeting today, since I was out since Wednesday afternoon, Im sure he would like to meet
*Thread Reply:* cool. Thanks! Just let me know either way so i can make sure my records are up to date. ๐ I appreciate it
587060 - Valid case, PD agent forgot to cancel pending contracts prior to Finalizing. Canceling the contract after finalizing file changed the status
No problem, I know I said I would yesterday but I was really pooped from the traveling when I got home. Sorry!
no worries! I didn't expect you to do anything yesterday
hi luis! Can you review Lead 728824? He is still in WIP status and I'm wondering if he's a valid e-sign. Arnulfo Garcia Hernandez
Its a valid e-sign... if we get a hold of him and confirm his neurologist info to validate that there was ever a Parkinson's diagnosis. Tony hasnt asked to decline that one yet for "No contact" for not being able to fulfill the WIP
getting hold of any specialist is hard no matter what you're trying to do lol
> Hi Luis! I'm hearing from ELG that Daniel Colter, Jr. (Kidney Cancer) is double represented in AFFF
I'm going to try to get a signed and declined. But apparently he's signed under two ELG campaigns with different co-counsels.
and apparently he signed both retainers on the same day
you guys have more investigative tools than i do. i looked in lawruler and didn't see him anywhere else but i might just be missing it.
I only see one lead ID and that has only been finalized once
Maybe he inquired via multiple links and another company signed him up?
Iโm getting like 4 million Facebook ads for pfas right now
No worries, I get random ads as well Im double checking the recording and he said he filled out questionnaires and talked to one attorney but he clearly states he has not signed anything @ 5 minute mark
Yeah the firm said he signed two at the exact same time
Ugh. Means the other company is having this same discussion
I bet he got ours and signed the other one too because he didnโt know which was which. Or something like that. Thank you for checking!
No one will be penalized for this. Itโs up to the firms now really.
Hi Luis, can you take a look at 810954 Justin Marks. We had closed OSOL on the 23rd I think but he was signed on the 29th. What happened with this one?
Agents incorrectly signed as non-osol. We sought permission to reach out and re-sign as OSOL.
Please see screenshot attachment
cool. just wanted to make sure we had the ok.
Hey @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M can you send me that lead again that was moved
We need to make sure it gets completely moved over to Chow 2. Tony probably knows
hi @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M What's up with 808754? All the E-sign activity seems to have happened after i had the retainer pulled?
there is no e-sign associated with that file. PD agent was reviewing the file to see if it was a valid DQ. She had incorrectly put it in Signed e-Sign IN PROCESS.
It turned out it was not a valid DQ and placed it in Revisit Lead status in the event the campaign re-opens or if campaign can be switched.
got it. It popped up in this tracker thing Ryan made. i got worried lol
No worries, it was a new PD agent and we already coached her on not using the in process status when working on DNC/DQ audit.
i never would have noticed it if it hadn't been for Ryan's tracker lol
Hi @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M ! Can you have the team review the attached PNCs? AWD is asking us to credit them as the abuse was verbal and not physical. I did ask them if they were told something different by the claimants when they spoke with them. Just waiting to hear back.
We are overloaded with work at the moment, but once we catch our breath - I will assign this out
I 1000000000000000000000000000000000000% understand
hi @deleted-U04GG7BCZ5M Can this PNC be declined? 666818 Looks like they've been unresponsive for a while
Its been a little over two weeks since signing, I will ask tony if he wants to
i'm going to have some more PFAS ones though. ๐ฌ
I am too mentally beat to look at this right now lol. I'll double check and send you the weird ones tomorrow. I just... can't at the moment.
ok so i got part of my brain back after some rest. I did a quick audit for low-hanging fruit with PFAS DL/Flatirons. Please see attached. I put in a few comments as to why i flagged these for extra review.
Hi, I haven't forgotten about this. I will follow back up sometime this week. I have been slammed
No worries. I did. lol
Well if you forgot about it, then I forgot about it... ๐ถโ๐ซ๏ธ
yeah i forgot last week to be honest. it's blocked
hi! FYI 661564 Will need to be cancelled. We can't transfer DL Flatirons to Levinson
Thank you for the notice, I gave the PD agent the go ahead to flag this