Hey there, Here is the Flow charts I made about how a lead moves through the company. It is a couple months old now, but this should give you a 1000ft view of company operations
Thank you very much! Great working with you today
cmatzinger@tortintakeprofessionals.com This is the dashboard with Billable Retainers by Date of Original E-Sign
just confirming here as well
Spoke to Anthony- the discrepancy between our systems comes down to the fact that his 'e-signed' number shows all leads e-signed today, does not remove leads that enter in non-billable status's, filter out test leads, or remove leads that have a initial e-signed date prior to today.
ah so if it was signed earlier but became billable today are shown in his report
Correct- Whereas if a lead got initially signed on the 7th, had to go to review and got re-signed today with the correct info, mine will assign that lead to the 7th.
Correct- Whereas if a lead got initially signed on the 7th, had to go to review and got re-signed today with the correct info, mine will assign that lead to the 7th.
we should get that consistent.
I will chat with Cam on what he wants because it can go either way. depends how he wants his accounting to track it
Sharing a success here- We just closed on a lead we have had since February 13th- using the new calling system! In total we called them 173 times- didn't give up, and got the retainer today!
thanks....using your copy here. Just wanted to reply
I have a hard stop at 12:40 but let's sync at some point to go over some intricate pieces that may be getting lost here.
Sent you an invite to the Sphere shared google drives
Secure Customer Exchange: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19uKHoqYRC6cmdSMEIE_7KlwMq8WmVhtH?usp=drive_link
Sent you an invite to the Sphere shared google drives
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19uKHoqYRC6cmdSMEIE_7KlwMq8WmVhtH?usp=drive_link
Sent you an invite to the Sphere shared google drives
Secure Customer Exchange: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19uKHoqYRC6cmdSMEIE_7KlwMq8WmVhtH?usp=drive_link
Just so it's on your radar- Looks like the call center is bringing back Manual Dialing more every day since we "stopped".
painful and I do think it's because of the lack of new leads
Checking the count of new leads coming in each day General business question though, if our current bottleneck right now is not having enough new leads to go around, then why are we hiring so aggressively into the call center, instead of allocating the funds we use to hire and onboard dozens, on developing better marketing strategies, or hiring at a "higher quality"? (Genuine question, I'm not trying to be snarky. I want to learn as much as I can so I can help make solid decisions as I grow in my career here)
Checking the count of new leads coming in each day General business question though, if our current bottleneck right now is not having enough new leads to go around, then why are we hiring so aggressively into the call center, instead of allocating the funds we use to hire and onboard dozens, on developing better marketing strategies, or hiring at a "higher quality"? (Genuine question, I'm not trying to be snarky. I want to learn as much as I can so I can help make solid decisions as I grow in my career here)
That is a Cam question as I am not on those decisions.
Makes sense-
Just to touch on what we spoke about a few weeks ago, we have people manual dialing on top of people going through the dialer, within seconds of the lead being created in Lawruler
Is that all to the same lead?
Billable Leads where the Primary Client Firm is SGGH
Sent Nick the latest set of questions for NEC Baby Formula PFS - DL - Flatirons - Dicello Levitt, I believe he's getting that ready for you now
Pulled it from the DB so I can also include question type on Lawruler
Sent Nick the latest set of questions for NEC Baby Formula PFS - DL - Flatirons - Dicello Levitt, I believe he's getting that ready for you now
Medical Records Project Proposal Flowchart - Made two different layouts, let me know what you think works better, and from there we can tweak any details as needed.
let me look at that really quick. I love how your head operates
I changed the matter section to LeadID because until an integration runs, we won't have the matter ID, which can cause issues in the flow. Changing that to LeadID which agents are familiar with, and we always send to the firm anyway just sets up for success a little better imo
Headed your way to discuss this
• Total number of cases broken out by campaign. • Disease State / Type of Sexual Abuse alleged for each individual client • Review Status for each individual client (i.e., initial intake, first round interview, second round interview) • Case Status for each individual client (i.e., not filed, demand letter sent, filed in court) • Client Contact (including date and type of communication) • Perpetrator name (for sexual abuse cases) • Responsible institution name for all cases (Church of Latter-Day Saints, LA County Youth Detention Facilities, etc.) Carter Matzinger [1:59 PM] • Total number of cases broken out by campaign. Yes • Disease State / Type of Sexual Abuse alleged for each individual client. Can be pulled if the question was asked and available. SA is a text box so the answers will vary in length and terms, if wanted just all data in the text or we will need to do some ML to categorize them • Review Status for each individual client (i.e., initial intake, first round interview, second round interview) Yes we can pull statuses but a challenge identifying - requiring matching lawruler ids for the stages • Case Status for each individual client (i.e., not filed, demand letter sent, filed in court) - pulled from DL report • Client Contact (including date and type of communication). Very difficult due to different contact methods and records • Perpetrator name (for sexual abuse cases) Yes • Responsible institution name for all cases (Church of Latter-Day Saints, LA County Youth Detention Facilities, etc.) Yes
Hey, I just wanted to edit on the above chart that we will not log into a portal but we would send the information via api to the MR company and then they would send an sms to the client. When we send the api data to the MR company it would have a clientID/first name and last name, Law Firm Name, and Campaign Name...or ID's, whichever is more appropriate.
Sounds good- We will need Dustins team to build a portal/tool for the agents to enter that info and hit 'send' on the API post. I'll edit the flow chart to reflect as such
Updated- When you get the chance, let me know what you think.
So the way I see it is:
Also, I want to chat with them about once they sign the retainer/hippa for us, then they sign the MR company text that they HR company can do a quick ping to see if that person actually was at a facility or some verification before we send off the pc to the law firm
I like these ideas & Love the idea of having secondary do it instead of intake.
Might be tricky to get Lawruler to build that out for us, but if anyone can do it, it will be you and Joe.
We would want to ensure that we have some documentation of the system so we can replicate with the potential Leadcomplete
Awesome- Thank you! Happy to see a previous client coming back with a list of new campaigns!
Hey there, what do you see when you try and access the page 0 ryan mentioned or this board here: https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/boards/21
From what I see on my end, you have permission to see it currently
I see 5 boards...I have access to this one
are you able to pull that report showing how many calls a certain number is getting?
@James Turner going to walk over
Sure thing- Best bet would be to go by a LeadID- do we have one?
Got it all set up and drillable!
This shows we called this one person 43 times from 9-10am
Did you slack Delk the dashboard?
I think I sent it to his shield- let me change that
He just pinged you from his Tort one
Yep- made him one earlier, and tagged him about it in a group chat
Sent the looker invite to this email: jdelk@tortintakeprofessionals.com
Thought you might want to see this- brought an issue to the attention of the call center in a way of just trying to verify if our info is right, and you can see the response for yourself
I won't watch it much but if stupid shit is said I can jump in
just ping me on the BS meter
Since it's a TIP group, I had to invite your TIP slack account, but you have been invited
@James Turner Way to go on this
Appreciate it! I’ve been diving into Agile like you suggested, and I'm setting this up so each step we build adds value beyond just the final project. Biggest challenge will be keeping folks from getting pulled into other fires, but if we can keep focus, this should be a big win for us.
@James Turner can you send me the agent tracker looker dash you built?
Sure thing- Just to verify, are you referring to this one that tracks our calls per agent/lead? https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/131?Five9+Campaign=&Five9+Agent+Name=&Call+Type=-Inbound&Call+Timestamp+%28Start+of+Call%29=this+day&Call+Talk+Time=%3D0%2Cnull&Lawruler+Lead+ID=&Five9+Disposition=&Lawruler+Case+Type+Name=&Lawruler+Lead+Create+Date=&Current+Status+of+Lawruler+Lead=|TIP - Five9 Outbound Call Data>
the one where we can see the bad actors
Cool- That's the right one then. If you want to look at specific agents / call dispositions, use the filters at the top to narrow down what you're looking for. Bad acting can be done a lot of different ways so it's made to be flexible.
can you send me the link to that dashboard please
https://shieldlegal.cloud.looker.com/dashboards/131?Five9+Campaign=&Five9+Agent+Name=&Call+Type=-Inbound&Call+Timestamp+%28Start+of+Call%29=this+day&Call+Talk+Time=%3D0%2Cnull&Lawruler+Lead+ID=&Five9+Disposition=&Lawruler+Case+Type+Name=&Lawruler+Lead+Create+Date=&Current+Status+of+Lawruler+Lead=|Click Here> <-- Click that. Slack doesn't play nice with the long Urls