deleted-U06VDQGHZLL
2025-08-07 11:47:06

Hey guys, regarding what I was referencing on the call about fee splits not always existing between the counsel/firms listed on campaign names. This sheet was used by Darrell and JP to log the splits before the new SOP/SLAs went into effect with Datavative and DL. No matter what, SL/TIP never assumed a fee split for any campaign. It slowed down the process at times, but kept risks to a minimum for us. McFadden and Vaspra were on some of these calls with Darrell prior to Cam asking me to get involved, so @Nicholas McFadden may have more context (as I mentioned on the call).

It may be nothing, but it seems relevant.

DiCello Levitt Account Insert Variables (2).xlsx
:eyes2: Edward Weber, Daniel Schussler
deleted-U06VDQGHZLL
2025-08-07 11:48:41

Worst case, you all will have this as a reference in case other things come up.

:thank_you: Edward Weber
Dustin Surwill (dsurwill@shield-legal.com)
2025-08-07 11:51:33

This sheet was only used in the old endpoint. My notes about the campaign in question from the meeting are below: > I looked in the integration logs for KY Organ Donor Investigation Lawsuit - DL - DL - Shield Legal and found that we have only sent that campaign using the new endpoint where we use our case type id as the fee arrangement in the mapping and they convert it to a litify fee arrangement id. > [9:28 AM] It is possible that they converted it to the incorrect fee arrangement

deleted-U06VDQGHZLL
2025-08-07 11:58:11

Ok, so a nothing-burger. All good, thanks.

👍 Joe Santana