Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 14:55:02

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG please get with @Ryan and review ASAP. On these sheets you created for me https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RN_lYhBTCQiH08ehz93M_g1fYufUHP1y10reMthvRPM/edit?gid=591298614#gid=591298614

From 1-1-24 thru 7-24-25

  1. I see in database 662 e-sign finals for DL FL (removing the DL Demayo, DL Crump) e signs that were moved to DL FL
  2. I see NO DL only sign ups during this time period
  3. The sheet you provided show 577 DL FL and 49 DL only I need this reconciled asap so that I can send accurate data. Can you please review and reply all ASAP? This is the last one that requires changes.
Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 14:55:05

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG please get with @Ryan and review ASAP. On these sheets you created for me https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RN_lYhBTCQiH08ehz93M_g1fYufUHP1y10reMthvRPM/edit?gid=591298614#gid=591298614

From 1-1-24 thru 7-24-25

  1. I see in database 662 e-sign finals for DL FL (removing the DL Demayo, DL Crump) e signs that were moved to DL FL
  2. I see NO DL only sign ups during this time period
  3. The sheet you provided show 577 DL FL and 49 DL only I need this reconciled asap so that I can send accurate data. Can you please review and reply all ASAP? This is the last one that requires changes.
Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 14:56:13

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG , once the sheet is updated with the right number of rows per tab, let me know and I’ll get the prices added per day

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 15:09:14

@Cameron Rentch @Ryan Reviewing now

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 15:55:08

@Cameron Rentch @Ryan I have to run into a meeting with Bailey Glasser. I am almost done with all of the investigation on these and I just need to put it together. I will send it over as soon as I am done in the meeting

🙏:skin_tone_4: Ryan
Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 15:55:40

thank you @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:00:51

@here I have finished looking into the discrepancies. Attached are supporting documents. • HairRelaxerDLandDLFlatirons contains a report from LawRuler with all signed clients for the Dicello Flatirons and non-Flatirons hair relaxer campaigns. It has every client with an e-sign date during the specified timeframe, including declines, to make sure that there were no discrepancies due to status updates. The declines were not included in the original googlesheet. This can be found in the "Detailed Report" tab. The "Tables" tab has two pivot tables based on this data. One shows _all statuses by firm category (DL or DL Flatirons) and the other shows only the statuses that were included in the original GoogleSheet by firm category. The tab "Update Actions" is a summary of what actions need to be taken to reconcile the googlesheet and the dashboard based on the discrepancies I followed up on. Some of these are noted in the "Detailed Report" tab, the rest are detailed in the other two documents. • Billable Leads All Time HR Flatirons 1.1.24-7.24.25 was exported from the dashboard. The filters were the specified date range and all of the Flatirons hair relaxer case types. I checked this against the LawRuler report and wrote in notes for any discrepancies. There are 680 clients total here, but we did not include the Signed e-Sign Billable Declined by Firm clients in the GoogleSheet. With these removed, there are 578 clients, which is one off from our googlesheet (there is an update for the one discrepancy). • Billable Leads All Time HR DL 1.1.24-7.24.25 was exported from the dashboard. The filters were the specified date range and all of the non-Flatirons Dicello hair relaxer case types. I checked this agains the LawRuler report and wrote in notes for any discrepancies. There are 50 clients, which is one off from our googlesheet (there are other discrepancies but the total number will be 47 once they are resolved) For your convenience, below are the updates listed in the "Update Actions" tab. GoogleSheet Updates
Lead ID Action Notes 113359 Remove from DL Original e-sign date outside of timeframe 104982 Remove from DL Original e-sign date outside of timeframe 175906 Remove from Flatirons Original e-sign date outside of timeframe 471587 Add to Flatirons Original e-sign date is 7/18/25 388504 Add to Flatirons Status updated in LawRuler

Dashboard Updates @Ryan
Lead ID Action Notes 117757 Update e-sign date is 2/8/2023 114510 Update e-sign date is 3/23/2023 146895 Update e-sign date is 3/26/2023

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:01:47

@here I have finished looking into the discrepancies. Attached are supporting documents. • HairRelaxerDLandDLFlatirons contains a report from LawRuler with all signed clients for the Dicello Flatirons and non-Flatirons hair relaxer campaigns. It has every client with an e-sign date during the specified timeframe, including declines, to make sure that there were no discrepancies due to status updates. The declines were not included in the original googlesheet. This can be found in the "Detailed Report" tab. The "Tables" tab has two pivot tables based on this data. One shows _all statuses by firm category (DL or DL Flatirons) and the other shows only the statuses that were included in the original GoogleSheet by firm category. The tab "Update Actions" is a summary of what actions need to be taken to reconcile the googlesheet and the dashboard based on the discrepancies I followed up on. Some of these are noted in the "Detailed Report" tab, the rest are detailed in the other two documents. • Billable Leads All Time HR Flatirons 1.1.24-7.24.25 was exported from the dashboard. The filters were the specified date range and all of the Flatirons hair relaxer case types. I checked this against the LawRuler report and wrote in notes for any discrepancies. There are 680 clients total here, but we did not include the Signed e-Sign Billable Declined by Firm clients in the GoogleSheet. With these removed, there are 578 clients, which is one off from our googlesheet (there is an update for the one discrepancy). • Billable Leads All Time HR DL 1.1.24-7.24.25 was exported from the dashboard. The filters were the specified date range and all of the non-Flatirons Dicello hair relaxer case types. I checked this agains the LawRuler report and wrote in notes for any discrepancies. There are 50 clients, which is one off from our googlesheet (there are other discrepancies but the total number will be 47 once they are resolved) For your convenience, below are the updates listed in the "Update Actions" tab. GoogleSheet Updates
Lead ID Action Notes 113359 Remove from DL Original e-sign date outside of timeframe 104982 Remove from DL Original e-sign date outside of timeframe 175906 Remove from Flatirons Original e-sign date outside of timeframe 471587 Add to Flatirons Original e-sign date is 7/18/25 388504 Add to Flatirons Status updated in LawRuler

Dashboard Updates @Ryan
Lead ID Action Notes 117757 Update e-sign date is 2/8/2023 114510 Update e-sign date is 3/23/2023 146895 Update e-sign date is 3/26/2023

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 17:02:58

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG, I need the Google Sheet links for what I need to update on prices

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:03:36

@Ryan it is the same link as above

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:03:40

I am making my changes now

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 17:04:15

I see the correct prices on that orginal link @Cameron Rentch, thanks @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 17:07:31

@Cameron Rentch @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG fixed in TIP DB:

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 17:07:33
deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:11:05

🙌

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:41:44

@Ryan did you fix and give me the updated sheet?

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:44:55

@Ryan @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG I am very confused. PLEASE update this sheet to be accurate. It is still wrong.

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:45:15

I need to send this report in the next 30 min it is urgent

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:47:25

@Cameron Rentch I did update that sheet. The discrepancy you noted with the 662 Flatirons clients includes the billable declined by firm. Do you want those included in this report as well?

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:47:49

something is still not correct

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:47:58

There are non-Flatirons DL sign ups with Crump for this time period

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:48:49

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG I am certain that is wroing and those were retriggered OR reassigned to Dl Flatiomnrs

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:50:16

@Cameron Rentch The only ones I know of being reassigned to Flatirons were the Demayo ones that we already moved. If there are more, I am happy to go through and update those clients as well

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:50:25

@Ryan

  1. Look at the DL Flatirons Customer Dash, remove Dl only, DL Crump, DL Demayo
  2. Remove sign ups between yestdday and July 26
  3. You will see 662 E-sign finals in their dashboard.
✅ Ryan
Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:52:05
  1. When I run from customer campaign by date, between above date ranges there are no other cases signed to any other DL campaigns between the date ranges
Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 17:52:12

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG ^

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:53:03

@Cameron Rentch I only have access to the Operations dashboard, so I can't see what you are seeing. Are you able to export the table and send it to me so I can figure out where the discrepancies are?

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 17:53:20

Sending now.

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 17:53:30

Thank you!

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 17:57:14

I see 688

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 18:00:01
deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 18:01:49

@Ryan Do you have a list of lead IDs?

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 18:04:29

No, the old SL system is an aggregate table.

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 18:09:40

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG, the prod TIP DB shows 680 in that time frame for Dicello/Flatirons. So use this as a guide: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1V2ANsKJUzjwi84s2IHK1RI7uRzghv2cw3wc_cbcc6e4/edit?gid=0#gid=0

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 18:10:48

Yes, that I what I pulled and compared to LawRuler. The only ones I excluded are in billable declined by firm status

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 18:11:36

I was just checking that pull's daily counts against the customer dash googlesheet you shared. I only found a discrepancy of 13 clients, which does not account for the ~100 that we have here

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 18:12:41

@Cameron Rentch Would you like me to put the billable declined by firm clients in this? That will make your numbers match

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 18:13:29

Yes @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 18:13:56

Thank you

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-14 18:16:22

It has 675 in it now.

🙌 Cameron Rentch
deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-14 18:26:27

@Cameron Rentch @Ryan I updated the DL Flatirons tab. It matches the 680 now

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-14 19:23:36

thank you @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-19 10:39:52

@Ryan @deleted-U04GZ79CPNG I need to run another sheet for for DL/Flatirons for Paraquat during this time period Dec 7 2023 - Aug 15 2025

DL Flatirons should contain 797 e sign finals (not including Demayo, no paraquat 5, no paraquat 7, no paraquat 1 - these were transferred later) Customer dash matches our dash - so Brittany you will need to show 797 for DL Flatirons

Other firms during this time frame AWD/Wagstaff DL/Meadow

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-19 11:09:50

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG @Cameron Rentch, I confirm 797 during those dates in SL financials and have the data ready to put Price Per once sent.

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-19 11:48:24

@Ryan reminder I do not need price per on DL FL, only AWD/Wagstaff and DL/Meadow

☝️:skin_tone_4: Ryan
deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 12:03:42

@Cameron Rentch Do you want it in the same folder as the other reports? Or would you like it separate?

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-19 12:19:52

if you can send to me first, I will review and then you can upload to the folder

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-19 12:27:34

Brittany, please post the link to it here.

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-19 12:42:19

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG ☝️:skintone4:

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-19 12:42:29

@Cameron Rentch, got those prices ready.

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 12:50:35

@Cameron Rentch @Ryan I got 787 for DL Flatirons when I removed the Demayos and the Declines.

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 12:52:58

I found 9 of the missing 10

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 12:55:35

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yvMbwH-KF4PPyKfimOPG4LI9t9hsg-mAC-6xHftJXqE/edit?usp=sharing This is what I was able to find for each of the firms you requested. There are 979 rows for Flatirons, but 976 clients

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-19 13:24:43

thank you @Ryan please populate the rates then I will do final review. thank you

🙏:skin_tone_4: Ryan
Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-19 14:02:45

Doing now

Ryan (ryan@themedialab.agency)
2025-08-19 14:06:17

@Cameron Rentch done

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2025-08-19 15:14:39

@deleted-U04GZ79CPNG you can now please upload the Paraquat file above into the shared folder. Thank you!

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 15:17:29

@Cameron Rentch

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 15:17:32

Moving it now

deleted-U04GZ79CPNG
2025-08-19 15:24:59

@Cameron Rentch Same link, but it is now in the folder with the other documents

🙌 Cameron Rentch