• NJ Juv Hall Abuse - BG - Ghozland - Shield Legal start date: 8/30 • PA Juv Hall Abuse - BG - Ghozland - Shield Legal start date: 8/30 • New Hampshire YDC Abuse - BG - Ghozland - Shield Legal start date: 8/15 • NJ Juvenile Hall Abuse - AFG/BG - Levinson - Shield Legal start date: 8/9 • NJ Juvenile Hall Abuse - Crump - BG - BLX start date: 7/29
Hey Brittney, that test lead for meadow with ghoul and was a test lead. The lr automation wasn’t switched off.
Yes, I saw that from the activity log and I figured it was an inadvertent send. Meadow Law was mostly concerned that we were signing more clients on that case type and they did not want that to happen. I will let Alexandra know so she can give them an update when she speaks with them next.
Did you shut off the automation yet? If not, I can do so that way you can test whatever you need to without issue
For the Levinson we just re-triggered the other 265ish leads, those should hit the log file at 11:30 and process by 11:42
I can send the previous log file we have currently and then send the other file once they process
once those other 265ish leads hit, will send you that as well
None of the tabs have SA number and our lead ID together. Looks like tab 3 is supposed to, but our lead ID is a broken equation
I did a xlookup on the cleanmldf to match the first and last name to the id off the shield tab
I told Meadow I would have the report with the updated SA numbers around 1145. Any update?
Leads just finished pushing into meadow, pulling th elog now
They needed the report 15 minutes ago for their meeting with the defense, so I sent what I had. I will send them these updates shortly.
Sorry about that. GCP took a while to process and send the leads into their system
That also has all the leads we have piped to them btw
Morning Brittany, did the ERD permissions grant work?
Hello! Do you mean the database that Dustin showed me yesterday?
yea, the ERD doc showing the relationship for the tables
Yes. Dustin gave me access to that yesterday and I didn't have any problems. I shared it with Aidan, also
In a meeting right now with Caseworks. Has there been a a successful test push to them? I know you have other fires today, but let me know when you have a chance
Per Daniel, no. We currently are in the middle of another test right now but dealing with this wagstaff bush fire. We have been testing their system the last 2 days. Daniel is the one on that integration so he may reach out to them tomorrow if today doesn't give us a successful test.
Please send over the SA numbers when you have a moment. I would like to get Meadow the data today if possible. If not, tomorrow asap
every lead for vga, we went by casetype number not name, ex 1705 is vga Levinson, vga w Crump is 1892, Ghozland 1749 I think
intake processed is our time stamp of sending into their system
Additionally, I am not showing any duplicates in the lead ID column for multiple pushes. Can you confirm for me how I would determine if there are potential duplicates to weed out?
Oh, sorry. Dustin has the table setup to overwrite it. The dup report we had previous was from Meadow's system
Hello @Ahsan! Forwarding you an email from Meadow about them not receiving 2 clients
I will wait on replying until I hear back from you about their status for the integration
doesnt look like we had a return id for these leads, refiring them now 🚀 , will let you know once we get a successful post
There was some old code for mappings that was causing an error. We did the fix and pushed to prod. Just waiting on the automation to kick off for the return id
Awesome. Let me know when it is successful and I will let Ashley know
I will just post the update in the meadow channel to keep coms simple and everyone together
They added a new field to the VGA intakes, fyi. Injured party's phone number
Yea we are updating the mapping and trying to fix the mappings
Hello! Have you started sending secondary vga interviews to meadow yet?
No, we are still testing, one may have gotten through though as I was setting up the webhook but otherwise nothing has been sent other than a test lead.
We are getting the secondary interview reporting ready and want to include any relevant IDs. Thank you
673531, 675786, is our test lead, 645104 was a production lead that slipped through.