Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-07-03 17:10:37

@deleted-U04HFGHL4RW @Nicholas McFadden is there any update on claimants cured with Wagstaff?

Nicholas McFadden (nickmcfadden@shield-legal.com)
2024-07-03 17:12:15

I am writting the email to Hillel as we speak

Nicholas McFadden (nickmcfadden@shield-legal.com)
2024-07-03 17:13:11

Nothing has been sent/cured

🙌 Cameron Rentch
Nicholas McFadden (nickmcfadden@shield-legal.com)
2024-07-03 17:13:24

Going to send the list that can be cured to him

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-07-31 14:28:19

@deleted-U04HFGHL4RW updates @Nicholas McFadden

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - Gregory Louis Atkins 541733 - approved, cure with new push

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - Harvey Dwayne Bynum 535510 - QA rejected. Can not confirm Paraquat was used

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - Ronny Wallace 534324 - QA rejected.

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - James Darryl Howard 534318 - approved, cure with new push

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - Jeffrey James 529616 - rejected. Drift case. Drift cases are NOT accepted. Must be direct applicator, mixer, sprayer etc

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-07-31 14:33:54

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - Billy Reese 538857 - mixed white powder with paraquat - please confirm paraquat was used

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-07-31 14:39:17

Paraquat - AWD - Wagstaff - Patrick J. Hye 539333 - rejected - opted out.

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-09-16 12:17:10

@deleted-U04HFGHL4RW @Nicholas McFadden guys - I want you to see some signficant issues with Wagstaff Paraquat vs Dicello Flatirons

AWD/WAGSTAFF Aug 15-Sept 15 = 1396 leads, 2% lead to conversion rate, 29 signed contracts DL/Flatirons Aug 15-Sept 15 = 1146 leads, 4% lead to conversion rate, 42 signed contracts

That 2% difference in conversion represents a MASSIVE loss of money. AWD has far more lenient criteria, taking symptom only cases w medication as where DL requires diagnosis of PD. The conversion rate needs to be 6-8% on AWD for this campaign to work and for us to not lose money.

Tony - this is very concerning, and likely is a result of one of the following scenarios:

A. We are not working AWD/Wagstaff leads and staff is "afraid" to process these due to prior issues OR B. We are signing DL/Flatirons that should not be signed and are going to be DQ'd after a deep dive

The leads are exactly the same. We need to fix this ASAP.

deleted-U04HFGHL4RW
2024-09-16 12:26:21

We will review to make sure it gets fixed.

deleted-U04HFGHL4RW
2024-09-16 12:54:19

Going to do some more digging still. I had Jackson pull the DQ's for Wagstaff and DL Flatirons. They numbers are pretty close to the same. There are a few more no exposure DQ's on Wagstaff. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o5BKi988HLAILtnvA7dh_rLqLZpzJpfJM9Sdzdtz4CA/edit?usp=sharing

deleted-U04HFGHL4RW
2024-09-16 14:18:31

@Cameron Rentch I also did some more research on the Paraquat DL Flatirons. Per your instruction we moved the old Paraquat DL Flatirons leads into this campaign. We have signed 8 leads up from these old leads. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tGr3oGsZQbcRELjbmbFK97M-PNC28mid4dl08jX_2E0/edit?usp=sharing

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-09-16 15:43:57

still doesnt matter @deleted-U04HFGHL4RW ^ the AWD should covert 6-8% it is converting at 2%

Nicholas McFadden (nickmcfadden@shield-legal.com)
2025-04-25 11:42:46

I shot you both a link to the google doc of some of the changes DL is requiring. We have edited the intake on these but leads have already been finalized so how do we handle them? Also, I want to address this with them now so as Darrell and Daniel continue setting the other campaigns we aren't having this situation again.

Nicholas McFadden (nickmcfadden@shield-legal.com)
2025-04-25 11:43:13

Just in case, here is the link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VmwDGcslubq91gYXYfQoQ95RQUimZsecFz4Y3kakORI/edit?usp=sharing