@here FYI we received the ok from Pride Law Firm for the Backpage criteria etc.
only complaint was the criteria. i had attached the wrong file.
@Carter Matzinger I'm going to email you a test in a minute just to see if it works. I have an idea.
So i just sent you and Nick a PandaDoc. I can see if anyone opens it. I can track everything. You'll be able to access it without a PandaDoc account. we
would also get a digital confirmation that it's completed
the chat works and sends notifications, I could see Carter's initials pop while I was on the doc, no charge for the PandaDoc usage, and it does integrate with monday.com. I think we can knock this out tomorrow with the flow and tracking.
We might have to bug Joe for some more access but I think itβs a good option
I liked this as a sign off. the only thing I didn
Didn't notice was if there was a way for them to make comments for edits
I'll play with it a bit. pretty it up. Let me know what you'd like to see on it. π
The chat feature can serve that purpose, but unlike Google docs you can't assign things to check off as completed. Only for commentary, but all parties are able to view.
FYI @Carter Matzinger @Nick Ward I haven't heard back from the firms re Social Media Teen Harm's intake. However, they did approve the criteria and even helped us tweek it.
It looks like Hillary left HRSC in August to join another firm.
@Malissa do you have any other contacts there?
I've reached out to James Marsh. He's the one who helped explain the criteria. there are a few others i've included. Nothin
Ok, I see Marsh is the litigator, so makes sense.
only one paralegal on their site, but maybe try her? Chrisna Bosques
@Nick Ward Heard back from Marsh. He's a little swamped but he'll help us out