Andy Rogers (andy@shield-legal.com)
2024-04-22 10:17:00

@here Please see this message from Alexandra Walsh Law Firm on their Ozempic

> We need to reject the following due to not meeting the criteria: > Santana-Romero because he had a blockage 4-5 yrs ago. See 3b of the criteria. > Figueroa due to reconstruction of her intestines. See 3c of the criteria. > Schmidt because she underwent bariatric surgery. See 3g of the criteria. > Please confirm these will be refunded.

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-04-22 12:07:38

@deleted-U04HFGHL4RW please

  1. review each intake to determine if viable
  2. if they do not qualify, review with Intake and QA how these made if through
  3. let us know
Tony (tony@shield-legal.com)
2024-04-22 12:10:52

Ok will do

Cameron Rentch (cameron@internetthings.com)
2024-04-22 15:00:51

@Andy Rogers see above^

Andy Rogers (andy@shield-legal.com)
2024-04-22 15:03:14

@Cameron Rentch The firm would like us to add the No history of intestinal blockage for the PNC as well. They are arguing with me that this should be “understood” or “implied”. Can we please confirm we will make that change moving forward?